Many thanks KK, I would also like to know about the recovery after each 150m. I imagine the rests between the short reps would be a walk back to the next start line - is that about right. ?
I’ll let you guys off for hijacking, looks like it could be worth a thread on its own. 
I find that emphasising the heel up to the butt rather than thinking about knee lift and the lift automatically happens, which allows plenty of time to step over and down.
Apology accepted. 
Hi ‘on the ball’ I have re - read KK’s answer and he suggests going by a pulse rate of 130bpm before progressing to the shorter sprints.
I’m planning on building up to 1 session of speed, 1 session of the type KK mentioned and 1 session of Power Med Ball. Following the 2 running units I will be giving them general medicine ball and bodyweight conditioning, with a few light weights exercises. Does this sound okay to you KK and others.
Phil
Sounds like a good plan. You could progress those two days like CF has laid out in the 02 forum review ebook. I think its the 2 HI days and 4 Low intensity days plan. What’s cool about your set up is that during the bad weather or lack of facilities you could go to the track 2x/week and then do the bike tempo on the other days…
Exactly.
I don’t like to place any emphasis on the kick-out. It happens as soon as the knee stops rising: At this point there is a transferal of angular momentum down the leg shaft to the foot which will pop forward whether you like it or not. It does not need to be emphasised. The action is up and down, not out and rake back although it may look like the latter.
Effective stride length has nought to do with how far you stick your leg out in front of the COM. That just lowers the COM and extends the moment of contact, damaging the quality of impulse and return.
Effective stride length real is the distance you move the pelvis forward from toe-off to landing.
Bud Winter may have recommended the kick-out but that’s not what his top guys did when they ran their best at Mexico Olympics in 1968.
And eliminating the kick-out is another reason times have continued to drop in the men’s sprints.
However, there will be an argument for the kick-out as demonstrated by FloJo. Closer examination of her form on video needs to be conducted to see how much the actual kick-out played in her record sprints because at point of contact in her fastest runs footstrike was very close to the COM…so did she even need to do that?
Phil G,
We’ve used a ladder like 60m, 80m, 100m and 120m. We’ve often made the rest say 2 minutes longer than the run so for the 60m it would be 8 minutes until we did the 80m.
By the time we do this we will have run lots of 60m runs so will be well ready to do this.
We’ve found this has still allowed us to run good 200m races. Probably you are still running the 120m very fast but you are still carrying some fatigue from the earleir runs.
Occasionally we will do a 145m run. we do this distance becasue we just run off the 400m hurdle mark but that is as far as we go.
Hi Phil,
Don’t really do any SE for under 16s and still had good results in the 200m. In fact i’ve had athletes win senior national medals without really doing anything specific for the 200m - only runs out to 120m maybe 2 a session.
When i have tried a speed endurance session with younger athletes i’ve used split runs maybe two sets of 3x50m with a walk back between reps and 6min between sets. Personally, I’d work more on strength training, hurdles, long jump etc with the younger athletes and worry about preparing for the 200m once they hit about 18. If they are talented they’ll still do well at the 200m without specific training.
Hope this helps.
Thanks TC and others, it all helps. We have used 2-3 x 130m 95-98% (20mins rest) late on in the summer. The older guy managed 3 with very little drop in time. I kept the 14 year old to just 2, he only did this a couple of sessions and a few weeks apart, his technique would start to felter on the 2nd rep.
Its a bit frustrating for the 2 lads, they have improved this season, but also see other sprint groups of same age range doing speed endurance and 200’s and 250’s i.e. special endurance 1 and getting major improvments at 100/200/400. I just keep telling them they won’t keep it up long term and we need to do things gradually, but it ain’t easy.
Question for TC and KK, at what stage of the winter did you commence such sessions and how would you progress the sessions you have quoted.
Also would you advocate 2 high intensity sessions per week rather than 3 ? the power med ball session is quite intense, but obviosly not as high as the track work.
Thoughts from all are welcome.
Hi Phil,
I don’t really start the Speed Endurance during the winter for the young athletes. I just put it in occasionally when i feel they can handle it and need a change.
In terms of the number of high intensity sessions per week. If they are young they are probably only training 2-3 times a week anyway so all the sessions are high intensity - because they can still recover just fine as absolute intensity is fairly low. Charlie goes into this in the Elite Concepts ebook and the Vancouver series videos.
Also my athletes are hurdling, long jumping and sprinting at 12-15 years old and will probably continue this until the hurdles become too high for them (boys at least) and then drop down to long jump and sprint - as the two are compatible until a point where they decide to drop one or the other.
Hi TC, the 2 in question are training 3 times per week. So do you bother with tempo for your younger athletes, or is their training not intensive enough to need it or does the activity they are doing at school etc serve that purpose.
Is the time normally allocated to SP1 just an extension of the varied work shown in the GPP DVD, and do you use short hills for the younger athletes.
Your input is greatly appreciated.
Don’t really do tempo as a specific session with them but i might do something like this on one of the days a week with a bigger conditioning focus:
Warm Up
Multi jumps
Accelerations
Tempo 8x100m (20s pace) - could be done as 400m the hard way (e.g. run 100m, walk back 50m, run 100m, walk back 50m etc).
General Strength Circuits
Warm Down
Is that enough general fitness volume to achieve the general fitness goals?
Good question RB, I was wondering as well if you use the running A’s for strength endurance at this age, I would imagine that it would not be a problem - thoughts ?
Just to ask again if you have used hills with this group TC, and if so what distances and volume.
Much appreciated.
I thought I read, somewhere, Charlie said racing for kids is enough speed endurance work.
Will try to find, but seems fair enough, as they need higher GPP work and what we would deem speed work for adults would be speed endurance for youths.
Thanks DMA that would be useful if you can find Charlie’s comments on the subject.
Not exactly what I was looking for but try this thread
http://www.charliefrancis.com/community/showthread.php?t=21560&highlight=endurance+kids
I hope that link works, but the thread is called Speed endurance the key to all 11/12second sprinters?
Thanks DMA, the thread started off very appropriate to my current needs but unfortunately turned into yet another Bolt debate, ah well the first 3 pages were interesting.
Question, providing I give them 1 session a week of acceleration/speed and 1 session of explosive med ball, would 1 session of intensive tempo e.g. 85-90% with appropriate recoveries (as opposed to 95-98% SE1 or SE) detract from their long term development ?
Hi TC, I have used in the past 7x100m round the track with 50m walk back recovery, so I could use that again for them as their “long session” to begin with. Then after a few weeks of that try something along the lines of what KK was advocating i.e. using 150m + down the clock from 60m. They are at the moment doing 3 sessions of tempo on grass with bodyweight exercises immediately afterwards. The other sessions will be as stated, e.g. Tuesday 2x4x15m followed by multi jumps circuits. Sunday med ball for power + general conditioning. The longer track work done on Thursdays.
Question for both of you - what intensities would you be expecting the respective sessions you suggested to be ran at.
I imagine the rests between the short reps would be a walk back to the next start line - is that about right. ?
PhilG
I could say that my record with younger athletes (over 10 years) is pretty good. We never had any serious injuries other than growth related ones.
I have been using the CF model i.e. MON speed TUE Tempo WED break, THU SE FRI break SAT speed SUN off.
On WED and FRI the kids do “home sessions” (Sit ups, push ups)
MON - speed - breaks 3, 5, or 7min, pre-season or in season (depending on intensity) 7, 9, 15min.
TUE - tempo 2-3.5min. @70%
THU SE - 3, 5, 7 min.
When we do SE I make sure they are rested before running again. Only on tempo days they walk back and run again.
But, as KK1 said it depends on an individual. They need to be assessed and you need to know how they react to shorter-longer breaks.
I know what CF said regarding young athletes (under 16) but I never went down that path. I treated them as other (older) athletes. However the intensity and volume was different and more appropriate for younger athletes.
Kids recover better (pre-puberty kids) than adults but can not peak over a longer period of time. With an appropriate foundation and strong core area (in particular) they cope well even with longer distances.
Cheers.