Respectfully, You say “bad”, but you don’t know our approach/model in practice.
You play with words, philosophy and speak about science, but you have not a model.
What do you search?
In our experience, who is really interested to our work came here in Italy and see us in action.
As I have just said, we work with ARP (pakewi is an advanced pratictioner) and Kinesiology, we have an integrated model of work, we have results, we don’t love model vs model approach, only results speak! Simple.
We cannot know all the models, all the scientific studies, ideas, theories and probably we are not interested about all these things.
We work on bioelectricity because in our opinion is the better method for enhance the body system.
Actually, and after about three exausting years of work, we have a lot of information about CNS/Bioelectriciy.
A little example can be the acupuncture therapy.
We have studied and tested body reaction to needles insertion on specific skin points or area, and we have done a protocol for professional swimmers.
Acupuncture generate piaezoelectricity, this give you specific body reaction if you use the right points/reflex.
The same can be done with much power and interesting reaction with ARP.
Another interesting point is to work on mechanical tension of spinal cord (see Alf Breig work).
We can release CNS/NS tension, fight or flight traumatic tension, meningeal tension.
You can optimize the structure with specific information carried to the body via reflex.
But these are only few points.
Then, Bruce lipton can give you a general point of view on body function.
Nordenstrom, Bob Becker, quantum physic, biosignal analysis, kinesiology, ARP concept/theory…and few other complete the scenario.