Women 100m split data?

AUT

thankyou very much for the stats…

great to have, am looking to have 2 of my girls go sub 12 next summer and can use this as a great point of reference from our testing data.

some interesting notes from one of my female athletes.
16yrs 12.19 season best week after testing

(blocks / et / gun start)
Gate Dist Time Velocity
1… 10… 2.278… 4.39
2… 20… 3.494… 8.22
3… 30… 4.618… 8.90
4… 40… 5.704… 9.21

fly 30m test same day

Gate Dist Time Velocity
1… 10… 1.105… 9.05
2… 20… 2.206… 9.08
3… 30… 3.288… 9.24

looking at the results from above this particular athlete will benefit greatly from this seasons focus on the left side of the curve.
fly 30m time not to far off the 11.95 times but looking at the 30m block times she is 2/10th down and remains that way until the end of the race indicating spd end was not an issue with this athlete last season.

Interesting stuff.

Aut71, can you post the stuff for the guys that you mentioned? “Then the Charts proceed with boys development 10.90, 10.60, 10.20, 10.00.”

The stats of your “12.19 girl” are really interesting, because looking at the German split lists I always had the feeling they put a lower level in acceleration and quite a high level in top speed together.

But most of the numbers I got are boys - very often with a football (soccer) background - who have quite remakable 30m accel times but “no” form running top speed. In fact some reach top speed before reaching 30m mark.

That would mean their training should focus on “the right side” of the curve of course.

here are some stats from a race of mine when i was under 20’s, its the only stats i have of any of my race’s.

so im not sure where ive improved.

enjoy

The mistake is the 2.86 for 11.20, it should be 2.96. Their flying 30m was taken form photo-cells after a 25 or 30m accel.

Strange they seem to consider that elite women have the same abilities as sub elite men… They reckon that men have better reaction time though (fact that have been well documented for decades now)

No problem, here go the boys:
Well, 10.90 is there already…

level::10.60:::10.20:::10.00
reac:::0.14::::0.13::::0.11
10:::::2.00::::1.94::::1.89
20:::::3.08::::2.98::::2.92
30:::::4.11::::3.92::::3.87
40:::::5.05::::4.83::::4.75
50:::::5.96::::5.73::::5.62
60:::::6.85::::6.62::::6.48
70:::::7.76::::7.50::::7.35
80:::::8.69::::8.38::::8.22
90:::::9.64::::9.28::::9.10
100:::10.60:::10.20:::10.00

30m fl.:2.74::::2.70::::2.65

200:::20.95:::20.45:::20.00
1.100:11.00:::10.55:::10.40
2.100::9.95::::9.90::::9.60

1/2 squat:240-280:::250-290:::280-300

runn bounds(10):35-38m:::37-40m:::38-41m

Earlier there was discussion that many athletes need to focus on the left side of the curve.

However, I find it interesting that the 30m splits are listed as followed:
10.90= 4.15
10.60= 4.11

I would expect more separation here…

Yes, you’re right. But what about an athlete with quite good acceleration ond lousy top speed?

Cool, real stats of a member.
Up to 50m you’re almost exactly on 10.60 curve, then you lose 0.2 on the second half of the race.
Did you improve since the 10.81?

:confused: Why would you expect more at 30m when there is an even greater differential at 40m? One should not look at any one interval as I feel it’s is the sum of differences at each interval that makes the difference. :slight_smile:

hey,
yeh im now at 10.59, but not sure where the improvments came from, as i have not had any stats of any other race’s.

according to my training times, my first 30 and 60 have improved.

a friend of mine had his stats for his 10.55 run.
his first 30 was 4.15, first 60 was 6.89. top speed segment was at 50-60 where he covered that in .90

splits from the 1987 world champs final Ben v Carl

wind = +1.0 m/s

Ben Johnson
1.84 2.86 3.80 4.67 5.53 6.38 7.23 8.10 8.96 9.83
1.71 1.02 0.94 0.87 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.86 0.87
1.71 2.73 3.67 4.54 5.40 6.25 7.10 7.97 8.83 9.70
Reaction Time: 0.129

Carl Lewis
1.94 2.96 3.91 4.78 5.64 6.50 7.36 8.22 9.07 9.93
1.75 1.02 0.95 0.87 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.86
1.75 2.77 3.72 4.59 5.45 6.31 7.17 8.03 8.88 9.74
Reaction Time: 0.193

Maybe it’s interesting to compare the following splits
(considering the "girl-boy issue, too):

book(F)10.90–mike10.81–jones10.70–book(M)10.60

reac:::0.13::::::----::::::----:::::0.14
10:::::2.01::::::2.00::::::1.95:::::2.00
20:::::3.11::::::3.09::::::3.05:::::3.08
30:::::4.15::::::4.08::::::4.04:::::4.11
40:::::5.12::::::5.05::::::4.99:::::5.05
50:::::6.07::::::6.00::::::5.93:::::5.96
60:::::7.00::::::6.94::::::6.85:::::6.85
70:::::7.93::::::7.89::::::7.79:::::7.76
80:::::8.90::::::8.85::::::8.75:::::8.69
90:::::9.89::::::9.82::::::9.72:::::9.64
100:::10.90:::::10.81:::::10.70::::10.60

i like this thread cause im looking for splits that are not of world class people. I run 30m in 4.15 give or take but thats my PB. recent PBs is the 40m and 60m, for 40m i got 5.52ht and 60m 7.50ht second time i ran a timed one is 7.52ht. I cant seem to break to the 7.4x barrier…Anyways my speed endurance i think is the issue as when i ran 4.15ht i ran 12.17FAT electronic (although this is a year ago). I have since got or feel faster and that i can hold out longer.

This is the qustions however i need answered my coach says to make my steps choppier, i dont know if i go anywhere though and am unsure which style is faster choppier then lengthen as you go or the other way around. He says my feet move and sound fast from 0-15 or 20m then it slows down abit, when i focused and used more turnover i could hold this till 25-28m then the steps get slower and the stride slowly lengthens, but in those choppy steps im unsure if i went fast for the first 30m or not. Also running 7.50ht i dont know what translates into 100m suggestions anybody.

go to page 4 of this article:
http://www.elitetrack.com/articles/maximumspeed.pdf

a 4.15 30m should be about a 7 flat to 7.1 60m, a 100m in the 11.2s, and a 200m in the mid 22’s.

was this electronically timed, man handtimed i ran 4.15 but my 60 was like 7.6 or over. Heheheh talk about acceleration. Anyone know any good acceleration excercises that proved effective?

hey
yeh it was all electronic timed

What are run bounds? Is that 10 steps bounding with an approach?

Protocol was 10 bounding strides (alternate legs with spikes on track) with 7 step run-up.

Women’s Results Men’s Results

courtesy of Kebba Tolbert