It seems that recently athletes and coaches are massivelly jumping into HIIT & Complexes bandwagon. Without having clear goal on mind BTW. Everybody is doing it, then hell, lets do that ourself too…
I guess that CF’s Medball Tempo work can be also classified more as a circuit workout, hitting small muscle groups, core, arms with medball. The purpose is blood flushing and active recovery, along with some strength endurance work, core work, etc. The fatigue developed is thus Low Intensity. I guess that medball weight is up to 5-6k?
Last season I have done with our GK some form of metabolic conditioning with plate (10kg):
A1. Circles around the body 8x each side
A2. Push-ups + plate on back 12-15
A3. Bend over rows (to stomach, to face) 12-15
A4. Side-Split Sqaut 8x each leg
A5. Side Bridge 20-30sec
repeat 2x
B1. Lunge 8x each leg
B2. Push-Ups + plate on back 12-15
B3. Sumo DL 12-15
B4. Plate raise + press 12-15
B5. RDL/Butt Bridge 12-15
B6. Low back plate presses/circles 10+5+5+10
repeat 2x
The goal was fat loss (man I was dumb :)), aerobic/metabolic conditioning, strength endurance…
Recently, the Hill-Haas et al*. showed that high-rep short rest training results in improvement in RSA (without reporting VO2max, vVO2max, or some indirect test to assess aerobic power/capacity). The mechanism may be greater muscle buffering of H+.
Another example may be complexes done with the same bar
A1. Clean 5x
A2. Front Squat 5x
A3. Push Press 5x
A4. RDL 5x
A5. Row 5x
I wouldn’t recomend this approach with technique lacking athletes. Cosgreve is main proponent of this kind of work (metabolic conditioning).
Another example may be BW circuits.
A1. Jump squats/Burpees 10x
A2. Push-Ups 12-15x
A3. Lunges 12-15x
A4. Mount-Climbers 12-15x
A5. Jump Rope etc
I wonder does this kind of training have its place in training system of the team player? What is the purpose of this training and how to implement it in week schedule? What kind of faigue this works develops – High Intensity, Medium Intensity or Low Intensity fatigue?
*
Effects of rest interval during high-repetition resistance training on
strength, aerobic fitness, and repeated-sprint ability
S. HILL-HAAS, D. BISHOP, B. DAWSON, C. GOODMAN, & J. EDGE
Journal of Sports Sciences, April 2007; 25(6): 619 – 628
Abstract
The effect of altering the rest period on adaptations to high-repetition resistance training is not well known. Eighteen active
females were matched according to leg strength and repeated-sprint ability and randomly allocated to one of two groups.
One group performed resistance training with 20-s rest intervals between sets, while the other group employed 80-s rest
intervals between sets. Both groups performed the same total training volume and load. Each group trained 3 days a week for
5 weeks [15- to 20-repetition maximum (RM), 2 – 5 sets]. Repeated-sprint ability (566-s maximal cycle sprints), 3-RM leg
press strength, and anthropometry were determined before and after each training programme. There was a greater
improvement in repeated-sprint ability after training with 20-s rest intervals (12.5%) than after training with 80-s rest
intervals (5.4%) (P¼0.030). In contrast, there were greater improvements in strength after training with 80-s rest intervals
(45.9%) than after training with 20-s rest intervals (19.6%) (P¼0.010). There were no changes in anthropometry for either
group following training. These results suggest that when training volume and load are matched, despite a smaller increase in
strength, 5 weeks of training with short rest periods results in greater improvements in repeated-sprint ability than the same
training with long rest periods.