I’m sure everyone understands you are not criticising Franno and he has said to me (last year) that he especially likes what you write on this forum. So do all of us.
But as I noted earlier, the information which emerged from Franno’s Q&A session last year and again this year which has been reported on this forum must in some ways suffer from not having a moderator to guide the questioning so that we cover in more detail the line of each particular thread of the discussion.
So what emerges from the unmoderated free-for-all is like “fast food” instead of a Sunday roast dinner. We got snippets of information as each person asked about their own field of interest/expertise (many simply looking for some kind of royal endorsement of their own coaching practices).
It’s not a criticism of Franno either that he just let the topics swirl around. And he did give good details of his 7-day week microcycle. But it surely would have been more instructive if this line of questioning on the structure and phases of his program over 12 months had been sustained, rather than constantly diverted.
Gofast, you attended the seminar - which, by the way, had 55 coaches registered on the welcome book (I’m told by one of the organisers). What do you think could have been done to improve it? And, by the way, congrats on your young 100m guy’s run in Melbourne. He took some big Aussie scalps
