I have a 14 yr old who wants to achieve the state record in the 100 and or 200m before she graduates. Is this possible?
She has run for approx 2 yrs or less.
She weighs 120lbs. Height 5’9
She has a current best of 7.8 in the 55m. She has horrible starts and reaction. But moves very well in the middle part of the 100. The last time she ran an open 100 she was just turning 13, maybe she was 12. Who remembers. She ran a 13.9. Her split in the 2nd leg of the 4x100 was 12.3-12.6 range.
I believe she has more to correct than what she has corrected but this is the 1st season (yippeee) that she will work over the late fall-winter season on speed.
What do you think is achievable and realistic?
State record is slow (relatively speaking)
100- 11.93
200- 23.94
Sounds like she’s good for it but don’t talk about it to her. Work one step at a time without pressure and you’ll get the best results in the long run.
First get her fit (time off the end where most is available) and then do drills to work on starting strength. I would NOT work on blocks initially as this can cause “paralysis by analysis”. If she developes the strength she needs first, her start will naturally fall together without much problem.
I understand what you mean by starting blocks to early. Thanks becasue I was going to work on starts but I think I will use steps, hills, and med ball. She is actually stronger than most of the girls (and boys) on the team. She has a good bench, squat, and clean technique I might add.
I haven’t timed her in the 30 yet but I will next week. For now, she ran a hand timed 60 from a block “stance” (no blocks). 8.7 Hand.
She looked unstable over the last 20-25m.
I think I need to spend more time on MV and relaxation. Her hips dropped back nd she begin to twist around the torso.
Thoughts, CF, Mortac, anyone with knowledge of this issue?
as cf mentions, work on the fitness (tempo, med balls), work on drills. And mostly, work on speed endurance. Speed endurance should be like 2x per wk and 1x per wk off actual speed for awhile, at least untill she can hold her form for a period of distance that you are happy with.
It might take a full “season” of speed endurance work before you even look at her starts? So perhaps, instead of timing 50’s n 60’s, time 150’s n 250’s? Where as in the 50’s you might expect to see a 0.3s drop in time, you might end up seeing 3sec dropped off in the 250’s?
I will try to respond concisely.
Because of her point of accel she hits her top speed at about 30-50 approx. Whe have only been working in the halls at school for the last 2 months. No 150m or 80m yet because you can only get in 60m indoors. Also, I try to limit the runs indoors in terms of reps due to the extremely hard surface. We have only done repeat 60m twice for speed endurance over the last two months due also to the above stated. Perhaps that is the problem though. No real speed endurance work.
Today was the first time on th4e track in two months (we used an indoor facility.) We will go there probably only once (maybe twice) er week from here on out.
cf uses this approach when handling the “indoor” facility problem. he does split runs, ie, 60m effort with a walk back recovery, turn n run again. do that for 3 sets of 3reps per set. with about 8min between sets and just a walk back between efforts, so maybe 1min or so.
I had to come back to your question re: range and scale of intensity. I had a sprinter who is now running collegiate track and she sent me a weekly workout sample for the sprinters. It is apparent that the coach utilizes CF philosophies but he has some type of point system that defined intensity scales very clearly. Where and how did he come up with this??
Without seeing the work sample, I wouldn’t be comfortable addressing the referred to coach’s schematic. We’ve used the terms range and scale for decades to define work margins of intensity with our athletes. In many ways, I believe it is similar to CF’s discussion on the dimensions of intensity for supercompensation.
My question referred to how much (volume) and how long (duration) of the higher performed intensities within the macro or phase.
Continue the good work and best of fortune for your fast young ladies!
Well here is the next two weeks for my two sprinters. One male, one female.
Their workouts are Hi-lo-hi-lo. The idea is for them to begin committing four days per week to working out. Last 2 months have only been about 2 days per week of sprinting and maybe one day of tempo. I cannot really work with them much due to state league rules until March 12th.
The cycle for the next two weeks focuses on Speed end 1.
Approx 3000m tempo; 1000-1200m of speed per week
1/16- 3x3x60m (walk back recoveries;8-10min between sets)
Weights (upper) Med throws
1/17- Tempo 4x100+100+100 (30sec b/w reps; 90sec b/w sets); core work 200 reps; A&B skip drills
1/18- 4x120m or 3x150 (15-20min recoveries)
Weights (upper) Plyos
1/19- Tempo 4x100+100+100 (30sec b/w reps; 90sec b/w sets); core work 200 reps; A&B skip drills
1/22- 3x3x60m (walk back recoveries;8-10min between sets)
Weights (upper) Med throwsTempo
thanks for pointing that out. I pasted the workout and forgot to change that. Every speed day of the week is lower body weights.
The poor start post was in October. She has improved tremendously since. Reaction and all. We will start using blocks this month more to transfer the work and power.
Do consider that the kids have some flex with this schedule. My main concern that I pointed out to them was that as long as they get 4 seperate days minimally of work per week and that there is no speed back-to-back days, I would be okay with it. I can only supervise 2 workouts per week due to it being out of official track season.
Just an update. My girl ran an 80m 10min rest, ten ran a 60. Her 60 was the best form I have seen. I can see the results of the speed endurance work already.
Hello after a long break. This has been a crazy season. THe sprinter I referred to in this thread dropped to about a 13.5-13.7. Ran a lot of relays however. Her best splits were 11…9-12.1
What I noticed about her is the asseleration has to be addressed. The turnover is in the beginning is very slow and she just does not accelerate with the rest of the field. I have quite a few girls who struggle in this area.
WHat are your suggestions? I think maybe she did not squat higher int enough. She is very strong but she just didn’t stay in the hi int range very much. Thoughts?
I had an athlete with similar problems - at least for the shorter sprints. Though her maturation level in the sport is low, we’ve made inital improvements with some med ball/plyo work combined with contrast accelerations.
Of course our investment into CF training products has been a major help as well