Yes you’re right. I think I was looking at the photo as he was crossing the line, and a head on shot which made his arm look perhaps more extended than it was.
I would agree he looks very nice when running at his best. He doesn’t extend however, but I am not really sure how necessary this is. My friend was doing a phD on sprint technique and he said that the extra force generated through full extension does not give enough benefit to negate the extra time taken to reach that extension. Thoughts?? It would seem from a simple observational standpoint that some sprinters run well with the full extension and others run well without that. I remember Tom Tellez saying the leg should at no point in the stride cycle be straight. I guess each athlete is different, and therefore respond better to different training methods and technical cues??
Extension is in large part a reflexion of strength to weight and you are always more likely to see full extension from shorter vs taller sprinters. It is not something to deliberately exaggerate or cut off either.
Why are you more likely to see it in the shorter sprinters? Just simply because their levers are shorter and therefore can extend in a shorter time period?
When you apply force and don’t limit extention deliberately, extention will be a reflexion of S-to-W, which, based on the law of scale, favours smaller athletes. Limb length tends to even things out for the taller athletes. If this were NOT true, the taller athletes would win every time.