So the day of the finals was exciting. He qualified 6th, so (I believe) he had lane 2.
According to him, his muscles “felt amazing.” He felt powerful and light, so the careful taper had clearly worked. We got away with having the bare minimum of necessary tone to qualify for the final, which allowed him to feel optimal on the day it really counted. However, the psoas / groin was a concern. It was tight in that area, and it was something that had bothered him in the past, but looking back, it was something that was probably always an issue, but he had just got used to it over time.
One of the things I recognize about my coaching style is that I can be quite conservative. I’m not too keen on introducing new things to the program unless it’s very early in the season. If I don’t know how it’s going to go, I’m just not that keen on introducing random variables. When it comes to therapy, I’m a big fan of Waldemar’s approach and not a big fan of Active Release Techniques.
Although I know Charlie had used Dr. Prebeg quite a bit and his work is seen in the Jane Project, I think it is important to look at the context. This was during a troubleshooting two week period when he was evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of an athlete. She was clearly not in the middle of a competition phase, so aggressive therapy would not be much of a problem in that situation. In addition, anyone who has experienced ART knows it is a VERY clinical model of therapy. The therapist (usually a chiropractor) comes in, either uses acupuncture, acupuncture with microcurrent, or EMS to prepare the area to be worked on, leaves the treatment room for 20 minutes, then returns to do a few passes for no more than 8-10 minutes, and then the session is complete. This is the model that caused his left groin / psoas to become aggravated when the chiropractor treated it with acupuncture with microcurrent, turned the current up too high, and left the room for 20 minutes. Waldemar in contrast, NEVER takes his eyes off you during a treatment- I’m not even sure he blinks.
The ART model allows you to treat quite a few patients in the space of a single hour at upwards of $80 a piece, greatly multiplying the income potential for the therapist. My issues with this style of treatment are as follows;
-
The therapist tends not to know the idiosyncrasies of the athlete’s body because of the very short treatment time.
-
Since the ART practitioner is usually a chiropractor, they don’t have the breadth of experience with different massage techniques that someone like Waldemar has- it’s either ART movements (which are very aggressive) or nothing. There isn’t a huge toolkit of strokes they can use, because let’s be honest, chiropractors often seem to see tissue work as “beneath them”, and when you’re spending 8 minutes with someone, you aren’t going to be doing time-consuming Swedish massage to work an area, even if it’s the least invasive and most appropriate modality.
-
Since the actual treatment time is very short, the approach is necessarily extremely aggressive in comparison with Waldemar’s approach- this begs the question of what is the recovery time from such an aggressive approach? (My athlete reports his tissue “feeling funny” after ART work) I know what the recovery time is for Waldemar’s work- near instant, because when you have a large variety of tools, the work done can always be appropriate to where the athlete is at in their preparation. Caution is thus required with ART.
-
The therapist may work on athletes regularly, but in comparison with Waldemar, they have an abject lack of context for the type of daily training being done, and therefore what is an appropriate intervention at the time. His years of working on-site DAILY with athletes gives him an ability to figure out what’s the most effective yet least invasive treatment method.
I didn’t personally know, and for the above reasons didn’t trust the therapists that were at nationals even though my athlete was more familiar with, and also had been worked on before by a couple of them. Perhaps I should have gone with his instincts and allowed him to get worked on. If it was going to help his confidence, maybe I should have allowed it, but at the time I didn’t like the idea of adding another massive variable, so we just did a good quality pre-warmup early in the day so he would have an easier time warming up before the competition.
As stated, he felt amazing and was very confident other than with the groin / psoas. The race time came, and the gun went off. I watched from the water jump at the 250 mark. All I reminded him was that the race starts at the 250 point, so remember to run smooth down the back stretch and into the final bend.
I could see he got out well- perhaps too well! He looked to be really moving down the back stretch, even running up on the eventual winner by about the 170m point. Then- it happened. The psoas / groin cramped. He pulled up at the 190m mark. I ran over to see if any major damage had been done- he said “I cramped- I don’t know, should I have kept going?” I assured him that he did the right thing by pulling up and living to fight another day. We had already accomplished our improbable goal of making the final, so anything he accomplished in the final was going to be gravy anyway. We headed to the first aid tent, and I got a Sharpie, circled the cramped area, and took a few pictures to document its positioning.
I was really proud of the way he handled himself- he had run a brilliant race the day before on very low muscle tone to make the final. He is very mentally strong and with proper physical preparation has all the tools to succeed at the distance. Due to our rushed preparation schedule he couldn’t finish the final. The most important thing was that I think he started to see what his potential was if he trained regularly and truly started to take athletics seriously. He could potentially be a player at the national level within the next year.
After nationals, we shut down our 400m preparation for the rest of the summer. He did not run the event again for the rest of our outdoor competitive phase. The rationale was to concentrate on gaining more 200m speed so he could build a greater speed reserve for the following season. Also, the 400 is rather stressful. Running the 200 is fun!
After a week of active rest and some massage work, the groin calmed down enough to get back on track. His opening 200 was to be at the provincial championships. There would be heats and finals. I was predicting based on his 150 times that he should be able to run in the 21.35 range. His heat came, and he blew everyone out with a 21.42, which easily advanced him to the final. His previous PB was 21.62, so this was not a bad opener at all.
Here’s where things get annoying, and this is also a good illustration of why you should always show up to meets with your athlete if you can. Some coach that he knew approached him between his heat and the final and told him to change the way he started! What the hell?? I was away on vacation at the time, but when he told me this, I was absolutely furious. This is an egregious breach of coaching etiquette, and I think I got more upset because other people knew I was coaching him, and the attitude seemed to be, “Jeez look how well he’s doing with that idiot- if I had him he’d be international class by now!” Just annoying- but I realized this was only a problem because we were experiencing moderate success and it was attracting a bit of attention; really a positive when you think about it!
Even with the annoying intervention, he was able to run 21.37 in the final. He admitted that he ran a sloppy race because he was trying to chase a guy who is a consistent 20.7 or better performer. I reminded him that he needed to focus on his own execution and forget about what everyone else was doing, but that would surely come with time and additional races. He is a fast learner.
About ten days later (we had good success with leaving 10 days between races) he ran in another 200m race. He was in there with two consistent 21.5 performers, so it would be a good battle. Honestly, before the race even started he had already won it. The two athletes he was set to battle were laughing at his jokes and basically following his lead. I almost wanted to tell their coach (who is a good guy and a very hard worker) to keep his athletes away from him.
Conditions were mediocre- the wind was swirling, and it was cooling off. He ran 21.21, which was another solid PB and is a very good result on that track. He beat the consistent 21.5 guys (one of whom had run 21.26 a few weeks prior) by about four metres. He is still learning to relax. We planned another race on an inferior track 10 days later, and planned to go down south to Texas to run in a meet in San Antonio. Unfortunately, the meet was canceled at the last moment by the meet director which was extremely irritating. We decided to shut down the season and give him a chance to rest.
Overall, it was a very enjoyable ride. Coaching is not for the faint-hearted; it takes up an astounding amount of time, but the rewards in my opinion are worth it. I guess it’s time to start updating the next season’s journal!