You already stated that your sprint volumes are on the low end.
Could they be talking about 85% of the 5RM? This would still be fairly fatiguing over the entire 5 sets whilst providing enough stimulus to increase muscle density. I could be wrong.
With reference to the original question, obviously a degree of strength is necessary for the start + first 20m, and injury prevention. However, I think it is most important to consider individual differences and gauge how well an athlete is going to respond to max strength training (in terms of improvements) and make a decision based on that. Lankier Guys like Bolt need strength to protect them a bit, but may not respond to this sort of training in the same way that they might from top speed or speed endurance development, whilst on the other hand, shorter athletes like Ben Johnson (Tyson Gay even?) present a bigger envelope of improvements in this respect, as they are naturally explosive and have great turnover.
Another question-will a period of max strength training (say, 12 weeks) necessarily slow an athlete down, if only temporarily? Could you work on top speed and max strength at the same time, or would this result in CNS overload due to the considerable intensity of both things.
I count the reps per 10 seconds and program accordingly.
Okay, Nick.
Yes correct…i’d say 300m per session mostly…
lol…not at all.
It’s not so easy for me. Someone else mentioned this elsewhere but never gave any solid reasoning for why it is the case. Do you mind explaining?
I for one would be hard pressed to get 3x5@ 80%, unless I was taking 6-8 minutes between sets. Anecdotally speaking, most of my college teammates would struggle as well. Even 5x3@ 80% with 2-3 minutes rest would be pretty difficult for most people.
I really don’t see how this debate is still relevant, if you have realistic volumes of speed, plyos, MB etc. There is no way that you can go into the weight room and lift circa max weights and expect to progress in that situation. I think a lot of people are putting the cart before the horse and are more interested with the details of their weight work than the much bigger picture of how all the elements interplay with one another.
Charlie (who some people on here must think is a Westside aficionado) has said REPEATEDLY that weights is supplemental work! It must serve the primary stimulus, not the other way around.
As much as some people may disagree with James, he is spot on with his assertion that it is mind-numbingly easy to attain the necessary strength (at least what can be obtained in the weight room) to reach high levels of performance both in sprinting and team sports. Furthermore, using sub-max loads (note: still can be “heavy”) is a much more complementary method while incorporating a holistic program. Remember, the goal is more speed and one would be well served to avoid deviating too far from that specific objective.
OK, doink, >than 80%, and they could do that too. HINT: 81% is > 80%. Eat some carbs. I find it hard to believe that most people think its some extraordinary feat to get 5 reps with your 8 rep max, even if its the fifth set.
For me this is how it breaks down: These numbers are slightly on the high end.
3rm: 92.5-93%
5rm: 85-86%
10rm: 70-74%
How did you arrive at 80% = 8RM? Oh a chart says that? Which is based on what? They are all one person’s interpretation of what they’ve seen. I have seen very few people, regardless of training style, who were able to do 8 reps @ 80%.
I can do 10 reps with my 77%… But After it I am done… No more set…
Interesting point. Perhaps Charlie, or someone with lots of race statistics, can tell you what the probability of winning is for the person in 8th position at 50m vs the probability of the person in 1st position.
You must lift around a lot of very out of shape lifters. Don’t know where I got the chart I use most, I have several. The chart I generally use runs for 1RM to 20RM. The higher the RM, the less reliable the chart, but for most lifts above 75% it is very close, and for RM’s above 85%, it gives very reliable results, at least for experieced lifters who lift at both heavy and lighter loads. I have surpassed every predicted rep max shown below, not in terms of more reps, but in getting more weight than predicted at that RM. I think in my case it is because I normally use a very controlled eccentric unless I’m trying for a RM. This may give me some extra strength endurance over lifters with fast, more uncontrolled eccenstrics. Those lifters, who are actually in the majority in the gyms I see, may have trouble hitting some of these predicted RMs. But the chart has proven more accurate than any other I have seen for experienced lifters.
What would you estimate the max load at each RM for most lifters?
100 - 1RM
95.0 - 2RM
92.5 - 3RM
90.0 - 4RM
87.5 - 5RM
85.0 - 6RM
82.5 - 7RM
80.0 - 8RM
77.5 - 9RM
75.0 - 10RM
You must be kidding, or really bad at math. You’re saying that a guy that benches close to 400lbs. would struggle with a triple at 315? No way.
I really don’t see how this debate is still relevant, if you have realistic volumes of speed, plyos, MB etc. There is no way that you can go into the weight room and lift circa max weights and expect to progress in that situation.
I don’t think anyone is arguing that point. But offseason/GPP, if the athlete has not reached an acceptable level of strength, there should be plenty of room to include some heavy lifting.
Charlie (who some people on here must think is a Westside aficionado) has said REPEATEDLY that weights is supplemental work! It must serve the primary stimulus, not the other way around.
ALL lifting is supplemental, that does not lead to the suggestion that one approach is better than another.
As much as some people may disagree with James, he is spot on with his assertion that it is mind-numbingly easy to attain the necessary strength (at least what can be obtained in the weight room) to reach high levels of performance both in sprinting and team sports. Furthermore, using sub-max loads (note: still can be “heavy”) is a much more complementary method while incorporating a holistic program. Remember, the goal is more speed and one would be well served to avoid deviating too far from that specific objective.
Bulloney. If strength were “as easy as falling out of a boat and hitting the water”, just about every athlete in every gym would be much stronger. They are not. Even many good athletes who have lifted for years are not at all what I would call strong, even when that has been the stated goal of their training. James also has said his athletes, I think he stated the load was usually around 70%, do not lift explosively. Do you agree with that? Non-explosive lifting at a 10-12 RM. That’s the ticket to speed and explosive strength?
Star you keep confusing this topic with powerlifters, James said you can develop enough strength to be successful in your sport using submax load, you may not become world class lifters but will develop sufficient strength for sport.
For the most part I think your charts are accurate if you are fresh and not competing with sprints, jumps etc.
No, I’m just talking in general. James works with football players, and their strength requirements are much different than sprinters. I don’t actually think there is some universal level of strength for a sprinter. My comments are confined to those that feel the need to improve strength, and how do you go about integrating strength training into an already demanding training program. Furthermore, I think that lifting confined to no more than 70%, especially if lifted in an non-explosive manner, is not the answer to max strength for anyone.
Star, the confusion in regards to the 1RM percentages probably stems from the populations we’re talking about here. TWhite isn’t bad at math, he’s a professional football player. He’s used to being around explosive freaks. And fogelson is in a similar boat. While not a professional athlete, the people he lifts with are athletes. Not lifters, athletes.
Reps relative to 1RM percentages should be expected to vary greatly between populations, with ultra explosive athletes falling at one end of the scale and endurance athletes at the other. Sprinters, which most of us on this site are, sit at the far end of the bell curve, hence the “strange” percentages.
On a personal note, when I was much younger and actually trained my bench press, I managed 305 lbs x 1 rep. However, I could only bench press 225 lbs for 4 reps. That’s 74% of my 1RM for 4 reps. For me, doing 5 x 3 @ 75% would’ve been impossible, let alone 80%.
If by out of shape, you mean people that compete at a high level in a sport the actually requires fitness, then you might be right. I’ve trained with people who competed in Beijing and people that will be competing in Vancouver and none could come close to these numbers, whether fresh or after sprints/jumps/throws/sports practice.