When we use the ARP on an athlete we are constantly in uncharted territory by definition. But we stay there so long that everything else becomes totally predictable.
And to answer your question further, with correct uses of the ARP, in reality,there is no need to differentiate between training and recovery, nor so between therapy and training.
It is all about human potential in the end. Or what Charlie, in his ebooks, defines as absolute output or output reserve. In the light of this is there really a need to distinguish between “neural”, or “fascial”, or what else?
Now please just sit and think for a while before you respond.