David, I fail to see how it is more effective. Your problem is that you are still operating from a weightlifting coach standpoint. I know the feeling because I once was just like that. But understand that olympic lifting training is not the be-all end-all of athletic training.
Your approach, while very good for olympic lifting purposes, neglects some aspects of physical preparation and disregard the need for systematic CNS unloading periods and regenerative training.
That having been said, it IS possible to use a pendulum approach with olympic lifting training:
Week 1: Structural training (general strength movements performed at a relatively high volume and moderate load)
Week 2: Functional strength & power (emphasis on assistance exercises such as back squat, front squat, power clean, push jerks, power snatches from various positions, technical work is 1/3 of the weekly volume)
Week 3: Technical mastery (emphasis on the clean & jerk and snatch, this constitute 2/3 of the training volume, 1/3 is squats)
Week 4: Functional strength & power (emphasis on assistance exercises such as back squat, front squat, power clean, push jerks, power snatches from various positions, technical work is 1/3 of the weekly volume)
Week 5: Unloading/structural training
This would work best for a lifter with verygood technique but who lacks limit strength.
A lifter who lacks technique would be better to use the following approach:
Week 1: Structural training (general strength movements performed at a relatively high volume and moderate load)
Week 2: Technical mastery (emphasis on the clean & jerk and snatch, this constitute 2/3 of the training volume, 1/3 is squats)
Week 3: Functional strength & power (emphasis on assistance exercises such as back squat, front squat, power clean, push jerks, power snatches from various positions, technical work is 1/3 of the weekly volume)
Week 4: Technical mastery (emphasis on the clean & jerk and snatch, this constitute 2/3 of the training volume, 1/3 is squats)
Week 5: Unloading/structural training