Saw some discussions on another site with Barry Ross. He makes a bold claim regarding Ben Johnson and Maurice Green. Here it is:
"I did not say that runners would beat weightlifters in a short race nor did I say bigger is faster. I said that runners could beat olymplic lifters in all but shorter races. I did not say that anyone believes that bigger is faster. I said that coaches believe you need to get bigger to get stronger. Please make sure that you understand and address the points that I actually make.
My runners have competed at every level.
Bloated competitors are those that gain mass through unnecessary sarcoplasmic hypertrophy in order to increase strength. A significant number of olympic sprinters do exactly that, from Ben Johnson to Maurice Green. That is because they did not zero in on the effects of gravity, but put more focus on relatively unimportant parts of running mechanics. Please don’t respond with how fast either one of them ran because increasing strength with less hypertrophy would have allowed them to run faster times.
I am not issuing the breakthrough, Peter Weyand, et. al. did. I’m merely addressing a manner of dealing with the issue of gravity and its affect on msf through strength training that minimises mass without sacrificing strength.
Unless one does not believe that gravity affects sprinting, every race is an example of msf(mass specific force). Weyands study addressed all of the information you are asking for, so your response sounds like you did not read the study. If that is the case, you might enjoy reading it, if you did read it, exactly what do you think his results showed?
I’ve addressed all of these issues, with the science behind them in the book including why MSF is a priority, how mass can be minimalized, why training for increased stride rate and length are relatively unimportant, and many other areas. While you certainly don’t have to read the book, I also don’t need to post every detail here either.