The Legs-Lungs-Brain Analysis

The Legs-Lungs-Brain Analysis Method
By Mladen Jovanović

Legs-Lungs-Brain are interconnected and inter-dependent variables which are ’unsplitable’ in reality, but they may be used to qualitativelly analyse training drills, their requirements and goals and the ability of the athlete to fullfill this goals. Based on the Legs-Lungs-Brain analysis one may classify the training drills based on the goals and the loads placed on the athletes. If one compares the drill requirements with the athletic fullfilment of the same, training modifications and decisions can be made. For example, if the drill demands for quick execution of the soccer techniques with very little metabolic demand, but the athlete shows ’flat behaviour’ and ’heavy legs’ with great ammount of metabolic acivity the drill should be stopped or modified because it doesn’t fullfill determined goals.

’Legs’ reffer to the training intensity or the quality of the effort. The speed of the movement, number of sprints, tackles, driblings, shootings and other high-intensity elements determine the ’legs’ component. Look at the quality and ’easyness’ of effort of the players inside the drill/game.

’Lungs’ reffer to the metabolic demand of the drill. Metabolic demand depends on the drills intensity (’Legs’), duration, work-rest ratios, intensity and duration of low/medium intensity activity etc. When trying to qualitativelly assess the ’Legs’ component, one should look at breathing patterns of the players. Are the athletes heavily breathing, putting their hands on knees? Look at the sweating ammount cause this depends both on outside temperature and metabolic demand. Monitoring tools such as HR measurement, bLA measurement can be used as quantitative method but only as an addition to qualitative analysis, cause they depend on numerous factors. Look at the perfomance/athlete not HR!

’Brain’ reffer to the decision making done by the athletes. Involvement with the ball, ’density’ of the players at at given playing area, tactical requirements/tasks determine ’Brain’.

As already mentioned, Legs-Lungs-Brain are interdependent variables. The incerease in ’Brain’ may require greater intensity and effort, thus this may lead to increase in ’Legs’ which may result in the increase in ’Lungs’. Various game/drills parameters may determine the Legs-Lungs-Brain requirements, like playing size, number of players, zones, rules, tasks, number of touches, tactical requirements, technical requirements, duration, instructions, reinforcements etc. Anyway, the discussion of this issue not the aim of this article.

Various forms of fatigue and other factors may affect the athletes performance in the games and thus Legs-Lungs-Brain analysis and the fullfilment of the game/drill requirements. The ’art’ is to indentify this factors, modify the game, to plan/program the training process to adress them effectivelly. Some hypotehtical situations can be found in the following table.

Anyway, the exmples in the table are only hypothetical. Please note that there are many combinations and even more reasons for discrepancies between game requirements and athletcis performance. The coach must indentify the reasons and adress them. This is why coaching is an art more than a science.

The next table is mine attemt to define game requirements based on Legs-Lungs-Brain analysis.

This was just an example and I hope you get the point.

Looking forward to hearing opinions on this…

Mladen

I always enjoy reading your posts. I think they are well thought-out and offer some great info…
I work in a university setting; what amazes me is the amount of control/input you seem to have over other aspects of training.
In the USA, as I’m sure you know, we have very little input into the actual practice schedule for our sports teams. Many times, we just find out what days we’re allowed to do what, and work from there!
I’m in a good situation with our women’s soccer team. Our coach totally supports what I do with the ladies both in the weight room and during both speed training and conditioning (off season). But I would be overstepping my boundaries to suggest how a practice should be set up, or to tell the coach how much running we should do at practice and when…
Keep up the good work!

I enjoyed reading this.

Three questions:

1.) Wouldn’t “lungs” be higher for a 2on2 vs a 4on4?

2.) Why aren’t all three of the requirements high for game?

3.) What is recovery ball tennis?

EDIT: was this ment specifically for soccer? (I’m sure it fits for many sports)

EDIT2: sorry, I didn’t even realize this was the soccer section. I don’t know too much about the sport so I might be off on the game requirements.

Thanks Devils.
Here, situation is little different: conditioning coach is important part of ‘expert group’ (head coach, assistant coach, conditioning coach, goalkeepers coach) in a soccer club, altought there are some cond. coaches that work outside of this group, individually with players. I work inside the team, for the soccer club and I am on paylist. My head coach and sports director and even club financier talks with me and we find a common language and decide what, when and why to do. Altought I am not fammiliar with soccer that much, I am fammiliar with its conditioning requirements and how to develop it. I plan the microcycle load together with head coach, I give load framework, and withing that framework they pick their methods and small-sided games and tactical drills.
For now we are pretty succesfull with the lowest number of injuries in the last couple of years.

Vision1,
I gave the tables as a short example, nothing fansy. I done the table in 3mins. I would need more time and experience to describe all the drills with this model. Also, I showed this analysis to my head coach this morning and he liked it. He even asked me if I could classify some of the drills we do according to this method. Also, I could add the type of fatigue that is developed with each drill and thus plan the training accordingly.

  1. Definetelly… but again depends on the instruction and the goal of the drill. 2on2 can means a lot of drills. This depends on the area, rules etc. For example, 4on4 with strict man to man marking can be more demanding than ordinary 2on2, especially if the coach ‘yels’ all the time, if you know what I mean :slight_smile: It is not that easy to classify the things.

  2. They are, but ‘lungs’ requirements are even higher in 2on2 and this is why we use such drill – to ‘overload’!

  3. Just an example. It is a tennis or voleyball with soccer balls played with legs. A fun and recovering activity. Again, just an example

EDIT1: I think it can be used with all HIIE (high intensity intermitten exercise) sports (team sports and sport games) and their drills.
EDIT2: Don’t worry. Team sports are more simmilar in their physical requirements than they are different.

If I was running a team sport, it would make sense to develop a set of guidelines across the system to optimise the chance of success. This way everyone could opperate within an area of shared understanding. Of course this is one hell of a task but should be worth while. I’ve found that having competing philosophies within the same organisation often causes the company (team) to loose direction. Perhaps this is a call for a “director” of training?

Topcat

You can say that again!
Again, I have no complaints with Women’s soccer. However, it’s highly unlikely that a strength coach who has 15-20 teams to work with will get along philosophically with all of the head coaches…There’s a few teams we (the strength staff) don’t even train because of differences in philosophy - basic ones like “I don’t think strength training is important” :frowning:

I was thinking more about professional sport rather than one strength team for all but indeed that would be good too!!! :eek:

I finally got time to read through this post Duxx.

I really like this model and I think it would be a great tool for teaching coaches how to build their practice. I also think that it can be of assistance to coaches who always like to learn more and who are constantly trying to improve as it forces them to think of the purpose behind every drill and to see if that purpose is being fulfilled.

Defining purpose for every drills is key point, from which you select the drills, instructions, duration, rules…
Thanks for giving me the idea for LLB analysis Guddi!