I have little time now so I will say a tiny more, but its 1am so probably not too much.
But some of the main factors that need to be considered and I am sure I have said this before, human performance is still from my perspective, like the rest of this little ramble will be, a pretty poorly understood topic. While some research does exist the applications or usually not practical and must studies are done on untrained subjects confounding the results.
What is usually seen is in scientific terms a strong correlation between strength gains and sprint speed, I do not deny this, depending on the exercise around .6 can probably be around what is expected from a study, but a correlation is just that a correlation, meaning that all else is equal, you can expect a increase in strength to also increase sprint times. I do not deny this and I believe there is still a place for strength in sprint training, however I believe this area is a lot smaller than believed. All over this site and others most of the board is taken up by questions like whats your squat, deadlift or squat, how good is the leg press, name the top 10 best lifts for sprinting, at times sprinting itself seems to take the back seat to lifting, this should not be the case.
Back to studies, yes I have seen studies about max strength, but again, what are these studies, 4 or 8 week studies, if your lucky you get a 12 week study, what is that, that is not a training program, that is not real life, real life is combining full season of trained athletes, not 4 or 8 weeks with untrained athletes. This being said, my humble attack is not better and it could be seen as worse than the studies themselve. Atleast they show evidence, however poor I may think it is, all I have is a semiuneducated hunch. I see individuals who squat 500 running similiar times to other “trained” individuals who squat 200-300 or maybe dont even squat.
I just dont see the correlation, why do you need to “convert” max strength. How does this conversion take place. I am not saying it does, and I am not saying my shot in the dark here is any better, or that it can even be used practically. Problems arise, how do you know the optimal amount of hypertrophy to use, whats the dose response, for that matter what type of hypertrophy, what types of exercises and at what level will increase movement speeds, how does this effect an overall plan?
A lot of questions yes, but are there not a lot of questions now in the current sprint systems, at times does it not seem like coaches are just taking shots in the dark anyhow and just hoping they get lucky with one or two speedsters?
I am not saying my idea is correct, or even if it is that I exactly know what kind of change it would cause in current training, it could be relatively minor, or result in a complete overhaul in training, but hey cant I dream that this kinda, mite, sorta be right?