bevolution!
March 9, 2009
Macrocycle 20 - Sprint Block
Microcycle 4 - Nanocycle 1: Lower Body
Rate An-2[/b]
Current Condition:
I’m feeling really good today. I lost a bit of sleep last night to barking dogs, but I woke up feeling energized.
Warmup:
Some RW drills
Build ups
Workout: Rotation Style
2-Point Sprints
2 x 150M, 300 sec. rest
Times of: 17.47h, 17.38h (.02 sec PR )
RFI Bicycle Abs
2 x 50 reps, 300 sec. rest
RFI Toe Pops
3 x 50 reps, 300 sec. rest
Cooldown:
Well, I wanted to open up the throttle and see what I was capable of over 150M, but I wasn’t expecting a PR. I know, there’s no way to tell if that was actually a PR with hand timing, but I’ll take it. Today’s session does raise some interesting questions though.
I’ve been able to hit 17.4h two times before today. Once when I ran a 3-pt 80M in 9.20 (video timed), and once when I ran 11.66 FAT in the 100M. The weird thing is, that a few weeks ago, I managed 7.23 over 60M, but only 9.43 over 80M (both 3-pt and video timed) and two weeks ago I only went 12.11 FAT in the 100M. I knew I wasn’t feeling well during my 100M race, but I think I underestimated how run down I was. If today’s session was any indication, it looks like I’m at least back around my all time best form.
I don’t know what I can attribute this too, but there are a number of factors that are probably contributing. One, I’ve lost about 4 lbs since I ran my 80M and FAT 100M. Two, I felt great today, whereas I felt like absolute sh*t during that 100M. And three, this is my fourth An-2 session in a row. Maybe I just badly needed lower bound An-2 work (work 10-25 seconds in duration). No matter what the cause, I’m just happy to be getting faster this quickly.
In today’s session, it looks like I might’ve had another run or two above drop off, but the RFI abs and toe pops told me that I was run down. If I had forced another run it would’ve been ugly, so I called it quits on a PR.
I don’t care if I only got two rotations though, I feel great.