I agree with you. As a matter of fact, I alluded to maintenance and training variety as two of the primary reasons to continue strength training.
Having said that, elite athletes that don’t use much weight training (i.e. King Carl) have use plyo’s to maintain/develop power and for training variety. And of course, accumulation/recovery periods also help break up sprinting plateaus.
Do you think an argument can be made for cycling left and right on the curve throughout different phases through some sort of semi-defined interval?
For example I was plateauing on squats and deads and decided to move into maintainence work on those lifts and really hit speed/plyos with more intensity. (Left side of the curve)
3 weeks later I went back to heavy deads and heavy squats after the plyos started to feel a little stale (I initially made great gains and then they plateaued) and had a significant PB in both squat and DL. It was more instinctive than set out in stone but it certainly made a difference for me.
I know this is gone over in CFTS but I was curious as to your experiences
Deadlifts were once every ten days or so. Squats were twice a week. One heavy day (doubles and triples) one lighter more explosive day.
It didn’t feel like I was overtraining.
I just felt increasing the intensity of plyos helped in the application of force for these lifts?
I am not sure on the terminology.
I just felt more explosive and coordinated after the switch. I am sure recovery and supercompensation played a role but I think the plyos helped a great deal as well.
Since there is not an inverse relationship between eccentric force development and velocity, would it be fair to say that forces developed on the track can exceed that developed in the weightroom.