I’m just throwing this out there and seeing what people have to say. My coach was really well respected and has put out some fast guys (2 100m state titlists who are in the NFL right now), though his philosophy is definitely far off of Charlie’s. I much prefer CF’s and have found it more effective.
Monday - Warm up.
450@99%, 300@99%, 300@99%,
and then maybe 2x200@65%. Rest about 15 minutes between the hard runs.
800m jog cool down.
Tuesday - Warm up.
8x200. For guys who run the 200 in 22-24s, run these in the 27-29s range. Walk back recovery.
800m jog cool down.
Weds. - Warm up.
4x300 @ 98%. 12-15 minutes rest between each.
800 jog cool down.
Thursday - Warm up.
8x200. Same pace as Tuesday.
Friday - Warm up.
If there’s a meet on Saturday, work on starts or relay exchanges. If not, there might be something like
2x400m @ 95%
Saturday - If there’s no meet, run 6x200 relaxed.
This sample is pretty representative of how we did things.
In my four years of running, we had ONE workout which required us to go hard over less than 300 meters (a 3x200 @ 95% day my tenth grade year.) Seriously, that was it.
All other “speed” days were some collection of 300s, 330s, 400s, 450s, 40 second runs, or 50 second runs.
Weights could be lifted during PE hour if you wanted to do them, though the coach never gave any guidance as to what to do.
We had some great 4x400 teams, yeah.
Some good 100 guys too though.
What are the advantages of running this kind of workout, where the emphasis is almost solely on long sprints? I mean, is there any reason to adopt this sort of thing if you’re strictly training for the 100 or 200?