Knowing what I do about Gittleson and Barwis, though, I am still strongly of the belief even with all of his shortcomings, (many of which I’ve pointed out and in other cases agreed with posters here) Barwis is no doubt better than Gittleson.
Barwis simply has not had the same caliber of player to work with, overall that is, that Gittleson did over his time there.
I think his over the top methods have probably led to some injuries but Gittleson’s injury rates were horrendous. I think even Charlie talked about this at one point-just as he talked about Mannie’s injury rates on the old forum.