Michael Johnson Criticises Brit Sprinters

:eek:

Former Olympic champion Michael Johnson has accused Britain’s top sprinters of lacking pride and ambition.
“At the moment, the biggest factor on the mind of British sprinters is to be number one in Britain,” the world 200m and 400m record holder told Five Live.

“Athletics at the moment is all about international competitions and they need to show a little more pride.”

But Linford Christie countered: “It’s easy to criticise when you haven’t gone through the system here.”

Johnson was involved in a verbal spat with Britain’s Darren Campbell earlier this year.

The American had cast doubt on Campbell’s claims he had torn a hamstring in the wake of his failure to reach the Olympic 100m and 200m finals.

Campbell fuels Johnson feud

And the American remains highly critical of aspects of British sprinting.

“The only time you see British sprinters getting upset or riled is when there is a debate as to which one is better than the other,” he claimed.

“Athletes here have to compete more outside the UK. Their focus has to be on being the best in the world and not just on being the top British sprinter.”

Speaking at an elite coaches’ conference in Birmingham, Johnson also argued that although there has been more investment in the sport in Britain, it had not necessarily reaped the rewards.

“You can’t fix everything with money,” he admitted.

"You contrast the situation here to that of some US athletes who have no funding.

"Those who aren’t funded might be hungrier and more motivated because their road to success is a lot more difficult and challenging.

“So when they get to the top they are more appreciative.”

People don’t always care for Michael Johnson but I’ll give him this - he says precisely what he’s thinking. In some cases that’s an admirable characteristic, in others not so much. I don’t know enough about British running to know whether he’s right here.

I wish he’d write another book. Slaying the Dragon was pretty good, as far as athlete-written books go.

I like the title of this thread: “Michael Johnson criticizes”
Covers everything that comes out of his mouth.

On this topic I’m gonna agree with MJ. When Chambers was around and he was amongst the best in the world, the other british guys had to run fast just to be the best in the UK, let alone the world! As soon as Chambers is taken out of the equation, the British sprinters become mediocre. Coincidence? I think not!

Ok we won the 4*100m relay, but only just! As far as individual effort goes, there’s only jason Gardner who’s won a world title. So on this basis, perhaps MJ is right…

MJ comments are fair. Harsh…but fair. I mentioned this in an thread a while ago. Since Chambers departure no one has stepped up and tried to dominate. What made me laugh was Darren’s comments on having no motivation as he’s “now an Olympic Champion”…PLEEEAAASSSEEE!! Not to denouce what the boys did…well done…Olympic Gold medal in the 4*100…but as individuals they did terrible.

MJ says what he means. Which is the major problem with the commentators over here…they want to tip toe around certain issues and not address the real problems and give true and honest opinions.

Yep, and its people like him who think that they are doing track a favour. To be honest he has no charisma. He seems to think that his acidic comments make him some great sage but he is a narcissist just like Carl Lewis. He also never stops criticising. He bitches about everything in athletics. Do they not realise that their comments are neither helpful or warranted?

I am certainly not defending the British sprinters thats certain, but I think that people like Johnson and Lewis are not helping with their constant criticism of athletes and the sport.

If he cares so much about the British sprinters then I am sure he could be more tactful, I mean what sprinter would refuse the discreet advice of an olympic and world record holder?

Even if he doesn’t want to do it on the cheap he could offer his consultancy services, NOT shoot his mouth off in public.

Is his criticism going to help these guys run 9.9 secs or is his knowledge?

What was his motivation, was he trying to be controversial for the sake of publicity or is he thinking of the well-being of Darren Campbell and MLF and J Gardner?

If Jason Gardiner has the balls to win indoors he should be ok outdoors too but he was injured and this has been a pattern. Stop looking for blame at the athlete’s door first. Instead, look at their programs, facilities, and training camp/meet plan first. If all of that passes muster, then look at the guys.

Charlie,

You have summed up the situation perfectly. Alot of british coaches are influenced by the the middle distance tradition in the UK. Intensive tempo is the main feature of their training. The typical weekly schedule in the UK looks like this.

MON: WEIGHTS (HEAVY)
TUES: TRACK 5x300m 95% INT with 2-3 mins
WED: WEIGHTS (LIGHT)
THURS: TRACK 5x150m 85-95% INT with 3-5 mins
FRIDAY: REST
SAT: HILLS 2x5x100m
SUN: PLYO & TECHNIQUE

This is your typical sub-elite to elite level training program used in the UK.

Unfortunately for Gardner he was injured. About 3 seasons back he left D Lease who trained contrary to the bullshit above. His training had many facets similar to what you may have set. When Gardner broke onto the scene (9.9 secs) he never run further than 200m. I have heard that he was told that the reason why he was not up there with the big boys was because he lacked ENDURANCE… so he now runs numerous 300m sprints and alot more endurance work. MLF was nearly poached by J Smith 3 seasons back but MLF refused to leave his coach, which is admirable, but in hind sight maybe the wrong move. HE also changed his training regime prior to the olympics. For some reason he was told that HE lacked endurance also; he then joined up with Christian Malcolm and went abroad to do loads of…ENDURANCE training.
Campbell has a big heart but he has infered on many occasions when interviewed that he believes that training hard over-distance sessions was the key. Since he is trained by L Christie, and I know numerous athletes who trained under the regime of Christie you can be assured that he was allowed to over reach on numerous occasions in training but did not rest. Active rest or rest is not a big feature of Christie’s training. The stimulus on consecutive days would certainly not follow a hard easy OR medium hard easy pattern respectively. It would probably be HARD, HARD,HARD, HARD. I was told by a well known field eventer who trained with Chrisitie and Jackson that this was the case.

Martyn

Unfortunately you’ve got it in a nutshell.
It would be funny but its destroying careers.

why dosen’t MJ get his finger out and start helping the athletes he is consistantly criticising.he has the knowledge and know-how so why not help the GB sprinters.carl lewis was bad but MJ just won’t let go or do anything about it

May be he is helping them indirectly? May be some of the British coaches know best?:wink:

I’m not British and I don’t live in Great Britain but I have been there enough times to be stunned by the lack of proper indoor facilities. I don’t have the exact number but I don’t think that there are more than 2-3 proper facilities in a population of 60 million. The climate is harsh and not very suitable for high intensity sprinting most time of the year. To me it’s no surprise that most coaches chose training regimes that are more endurance orientated.

There might me good funding for athletes in GB and that is probably making it possible for the best to spend some time in warm weather. But still, the majority of the training for most GB sprinters has to be done in less favorable conditions.

Easy to criticize if you live in Texas or Sunny California. Get a reality check; you can’t coach sprinters on the highway!

Håkan Andersson
Sundvall, Sweden

To your knowledge, HAS he been helping anyone?

Why does it seem a lot of the top British sprinters are MASSIVELY developed and look almost like bodybuilders?

Linford, Chambers etc.

Is it due to the lack of extensive tempo in the program or is it due to their propensity to perform a ton of weight training?

I think MJ considers how his comments will further his career as a “commentator” more so than how they will help athletics in general…

BTW I LOVED watching Donovan destroy him in the Skydome :smiley:

I met Mark Mccoy that day as well and got his autograph. :slight_smile:

This is fairly to the point Hakan. However the elite sprinters are very well funded from our National Lottery scheme. Essentially from every pound spent on a lotto ticket, roughly 60% of that will be put into arts and sports projects up and down the UK. It is this money that helps to fund the athletes as well as money from UK:Athletics. The money they get is equivalent to £30k a year!

So for all the funding they get, enabling them to train all year round in warmer climes, there’s no excuse for such mediocrity produced by our sprinters.

There aren’t too many top class facilities for the athletes to use in the UK, but this is slowly but surely changing. So i guess in 5-10 years time we’ll start reaping what’s started to be sown…

Linford and Chambers are two different cases. Linford was tremendously well built for a spriter of his height. Dwain, unlike Linford, was overbuilt and suffered from a lack of flexibility, particularly in the quads, IMO.

That is a very interesting point.

I remember watching clips from Linford in the early 90s and he was one of the most flexible athletes I have ever seen.

Yes, he was!

He already does.

If he really wants to help, then he should shut his pie-hole and get on with the job. You can’t get the job done by giving with one hand and taking away with the other!
In fairness to Michael, though, one of the problems for the highest level athletes is to understand the real impact of the work he would have considered trivial at his peak on someone less developed than he ultimately was. The athlete dies and Michael thinks he’s dogging it!
I hear this is also a problem with Linford at times.