London Logo controversy

When Sebastian Coe unveiled the logo for the 2012 Olympics in London yesterday he described it as an invitation for people everywhere to participate. Rarely, even in his glittering athletics career, can Lord Coe’s ambitions have been realised so spectacularly.

Within moments the first howls of dissent had registered in cyberspace. By lunchtime a petition had been posted calling on the Games’ organising committee “to scrap and change the ridiculous logo unveiled for the London 2012 Olympics” and by 7pm it had more than 8,000 signatures.

On the BBC website thousands mocked the design, comparing it to a disfigured swastika and a window that had had a football kicked through it. Others poured scorn on the £400,000 paid to a brand consultancy to produce it.

Instead of whetting the world’s appetite for “Everyone’s Games” as hoped, the Olympic organisers found themselves fighting a furious rearguard action in defence of their expensively acquired new brand identity.

Paul Deighton, the chief executive of London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games, said: “This is a bold logo. We were a bold bid and this will be a bold Games. We make no apology.”

No competition was held for the work.

The committee selected Wolff Olins, the brand consultancy which has previously produced logos for Sony Ericsson, Unilever and Macmillan Cancer Support.

Wolff Olins was briefed to take the Olympics away from its corporate image, to make it more “street” and less boardroom. Above all the consultancy was urged to reach out to a younger audience which has become steadily less interested in the Olympic movement over the past 20 years.

The rebranding exercise took more than a year and cost £400,000, which was met privately rather than through public funds, Mr Deighton said.

“This logo is going to be key to us raising money commercially. All our worldwide sponsors are ecstatic with it. The moment everybody in the team [organising the Games] saw the shape it was a unanimous decision to move on that basis.”

However an informed source told The Times last night that the logo had provoked disagreement among two leading figures involved with the Games.

Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London, was said to have been “frozen out” of the discussion months ago because he clashed with Lord Coe over the design and was shown the final version only about a week ago, the source said. “He hated it.”

Mr Livingstone’s office declined to comment, but a spokeswoman for the committee said that Mr Livingstone or his officials had been consulted, along with other stakeholders.

The new logo, a bold jagged emblem based on the numbers “2012”, comes in a series of very bright shades of pink, blue, green and orange, in a modern take on the Olympic colours.

It is intended to be versatile, eye-catching and easily animated, and to look good on mobile phones and websites as well as more traditional media such as mugs, mascots and T-shirts.

The word “London” and the Olympic rings are included in the first two digits but there are no obvious visual references to London landmarks, unlike the last time the city hosted the Games when the Houses of Parliament featured on the 1948 Olympic logo.

Lord Coe, the London organising committee chairman, introduced the new logo yesterday with a dynamic presentation at the Roundhouse in North London, supported by sporting celebrities such as Dame Kelly Holmes and Denise Lewis, the athletes, Jose Mourinho, the Chelsea football manager, and Andy Murray, the tennis player.

There were shades of his call to arms in Singapore two years ago when he pledged to use the London Games to challenge young people to return to sport.

“London will be Everyone’s Games, everyone’s 2012,” he said. “This is the vision at the very heart of our brand. It will define the venues we build and the Games we hold and act as a reminder of our promise to use the Olympic spirit to inspire everyone and reach out to young people around the world. It is an invitation to take part and be involved.

“We believe we have got something that will live, something that will help us as we approach the Games, something with an international feel and something that will help us with business.”

Tony Blair said: “We want London 2012 not just to be about elite sporting success. When people see the new brand, we want them to be inspired to make a positive change in their life.”

This message will be repeated over the next three months when London 2012 hosts road-shows at 27 venues around the country.

The logo looks like an attempt to use construction paper gone very wrong in a kindergarten class only not done quite as well.
:frowning: :confused: :eek:

It truly is a bad design, even tho I know it reads 2012, I still don’t see it easily, hard to explain, just so scrambled, looks terrible. Why not make 10 designs and allow the public to vote, I dont know, anything but that.

yeah, i had to look back to see the 2012 inside the logo. Real poor effort, two thumbs down from me.

I thought this blog review was quite funny

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/art/2007/06/how_lisa_simpson_took_the_olym.html
I wouldn’t usually post stuff like this from the gutter but… I just had to share the last bit with someone else!

If you stare at it long enough, some dirty-minded bloggers have been saying, it kind of looks like Lisa Simpson giving someone a blow job

Some alternatives…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/6719747.stm

Make your own…
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=51744&in_page_id=34&ito=newsnow

Get rid of it…
http://www.gopetition.co.uk/petitions/change-the-london-2012-logo.html

MAKE SURE YOU CHECK THE LINKS FROM THE SITE!

The 2012 Olympics logo blows in more ways than one.

June 5, 2007 3:03 PM | Printable version

A quietly spoken and clearly thoughtful boy at an infant school interviewed for the 10.30pm news last night got it exactly right. He told ITV’s reporter in no uncertain terms what he thought of the newly unveiled London 2012 Olympics logo. “Rubbish”. And, who could possibly disagree? Surely not those who have likened the image to cartoon character, Lisa Simpson, giving London a blow job. Oh dear. I’m sorry. But, it does look like that. And who, even the cleanest minded among us, is going to think anything else now?

Yesterday was not April 1, although you might have had to pinch yourself as you checked the calendar. Surely the graphic designers (sorry, “brand consultants”) who came up with this dismal £400,000 design had been playing around in the studio. It’s all been a joke, 100 per cent visual satire, a smutty-minded game played, one can’t help thinking, by young designers, fed up with the whole bullying, secretive, puerile London Olympics fiasco as this desperately “well wicked” and “down with kids” juggernaut, this Millennium Experience Mk2, with gangs of imaginatively paid consultants and fawning toadies in search of CBEs and knighthoods, hanging from its money-shedding sides, rumbles towards Stratford and 2012.

Sadly, the logo, already likened to a “broken swastika” - a very punk swastika - may yet be with us for another five desperate years. This is the way we want to be seen by the rest of the world now that we live, according to Olympics executives and government ministers, in a world in which we are all “modern”, “flexible”, “brand savvy” and young people (ie “kids”, those baseball-capped, consumer-crazy, skateboarding yoof we need to get down with) “no longer relate to static logos.” Innit.

Look at the throwaway word “London” plonked inside the logo; the lettering appears to be based on the kind of crude, knife-carved scrawl most often found on the walls of public lavatories. It stinks. And, it implies that London is little more than, if not one big toilet, the façade of a high street chain store.

The logo fails the Olympics spirit completely. Its component parts are broken apart, while the Olympics are all about athletes, spectators and nations joining together. Now look at the original Olympics symbol, designed by Pierre de Coubterin, founder of the modern Games, in 1913 and first displayed at the Antwerp Olympics of 1920. This is a superb design, its five intertwined rings evoking the idea of continents linked together. It is far from being “static”, and is as eye-catching and as appropriately expressive of the Olympics today as it was in those unfortunate days gone by when people (no “kids” then) eeked out a savvyless living without, like, “brands” to sustain them.

The problem with all this is that the new logo is fundamentally patronising. Would-be adults in charge of events like the London 2012 Olympics should put childish things, language and “brand savvy” logos aside. No child is impressed by parents who try to dress like infants in, for example, all-day pyjama outfits and baseball caps, or who try to speak in the latest, and supposedly fashionable, jargon.

The Olympics should exist to raise our collective hopes, expectations and sights. This logo, though, is one of the saddest modern sights of all, and this from a city that produced the rightly world-famous London Transport logo. There are no medals here. Only “rubbish”.

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/art/2007/06/how_lisa_simpson_took_the_olym.html

TC, that animation could be the start of WWIII after what looks to have been done by some German - “olympicgschpunken” sounds deutsche - to England’s London Olympics logo!

Where did you find this animation???

Someone posted it in the comments section of a blog I read about the logo. I think it might have been on the BBC site? I can’t remember but I thought it was just quite amazingly funny. Once you see it you can never get the image out of your mind… 2012 is truly cursed!

so what is the logo actually supposed to represent?

Kind of follows doesn’t it? First the athletes are having fits after they are confronted by the athlete’s contracts, then the public has fits after they see the logo.
Wonder what sort of fits Brits will have after they get the bill!

According to Lord Coe, this will really be the first Games, where the hosting country is “forced” to take advantage of the buildings post-Olympics. It can’t be that bad then… :stuck_out_tongue: At least, I hope, they do better than Athens; it won’t be difficult…

Support for the games in the city is ebbing with each new f£ck up.

SebCoe and attrocity

All this money and controversy for a bloody logo - who cares. Should have invested the money into coaching / development. Success will get people talking.

Seb looks very embarassed in that photo. No surprise there.

Maybe I’m naive (hopefully that’s all) but, even though I know Coe would be getting a very sweet paypacket out of this London caper, I really think he is doing what he believes is best to boost sports etc in the UK. I know a lot of folk think he’s arrogant and aloof, but I know him a little bit and once you break that defense down, he’s actually a nice guy. I hope things turn around for him and London puts on a great show.

Some alternatives…

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/6722205.stm

I like the first one…Who would have thought 2012don works, so cool…

#1,4,6 and maybe 10 but its pushing it are all really cool.

I only like one and two the others suck. and the old logo looks pretty undesirable.