the solution is simple:
we can collect the main features of CFTS and Vittori SistTraining and then to go for facing:
- Short to Long or Long to Short? ok, all depends by the sprinter
- how type of periodizating: simple? double? triple?
- introducing of aerobic work: many in italy spend time for this work, also after speed work! you can see Mennea or other sprinter (also junior european champion!)
- volume of training: ok, mennea was a freak and ran 5 x 5 @ 60 m after a lot of plyos but then he ran other rps (how we can see in the book of mennea)
In Italy, many sprinter goes to 4 x 4 x 60 m - intensity of rps
- frequency
- how to gain speed: in CFTS we can use iperspeeding? is speed related to lenght of training?
oh, yes: i remember (i have the article) vittori when (after Athens 1997) Greene couldn’t improve because he was just percect and because he did shortsteps (45.5)
This man, ceteris paribus, improve 0"11 since that race! - strength program
- taper strategy
we can talk about this items
I have (ok, it is one and i don’t know who is the writer but i remembered a famous english coach) an article for english (elite) sprinter, some advices:
the are many point with the italian ones: too working in intermediate speed, much plyos, iperspeed and classical frequency of working
And, if we see the trend of season PB of the best english sprinter, we see the same trend for italian ones…
same problems?
PS: i think mennea would say he never pulled in hams