Fuzzy Hypertrophy Program

Fuzzy Hypertrophy Program
by Mladen Jovanovic

Fuzzy logic and Conjugate Sequence System

What would you answer, if I ask you is it daytime at your current time? Yes or no? And what if I ask you same question at 6AM, 1PM and 7PM, what would the answer be? I belive that you would have very hard time deciding beween „yes“ and „no“ answers…

I see a lot of people (athletes, coaches) asking the same type questions over and over again:
„Is it whole body system or split system“
„Is it structural, hypertrophy or max strength work“
„Is it general preparation or specific one“
„Is warm-up statical or dynamical“
(fill the blank with your own question)
And they mostly expect „yes“ or „no“ answers. This is example of binary logic, where the answer is true or false. But gentlemen, in training (nor life), there is no „yes“ or „no“, „black“ and „white“, „good“ and „evil“, there is rather a continuum between them, or somekind of a „grey zone“. This is grey logic, or fuzzy logic where the truth is a matter of a degree.
For those who are interested more in fuzzy logic, there is a great review at Mathworks, developers of famous MATLAB! The link is here:
http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf_doc/fuzzy/fuzzy.pdf

Fuzzy logic usage is not new in training. A lot of coaches uses it without knowing. One example is Charlie Francis whos major quote is „Everything is done only the volume varies“. This is a example of Russian Conjugate Sequence System (CSS), where every aspect of training is done, but with fluctuating emphasis/volume, thus when one apsect is developed, others are maintained. A time frame under which „everything is done“ is not necceserely one training, but training microcycle.

Superiority of CSS is manifested when working with well developed athletes. In fact, linear/sequential methods can be used with novice athletes allowing progression in load (intensity, volume) and technique acquisition, but as soon athletes develops optimal levels GPP and SPP, CSS is superior in comparation to other methods. Why? Because, when you concentrate on one aspect of training (be it speed, endurance, hypertrophy, max strength to name a few) other aspect will fall, so you are basically going round in circle and starting from a scratch every time the cycle begins. The result is stagnation! CSS solves this problem!

Dont forget that, as Charlie Francis said, there is a lot of ways to skin a cat, but I would add, if you choose appropriate one. This „appropriate cat“ is goal settings, or the goals you want to achieve with your training process. There is a lot of great programs out there, and I belive that you should not look at this one presented here as an ultimate one, but rather as another tool in your coaching toolbox.

Fuzzy Hypertrophy Program

This program presented here is based on Fuzzy logic and CSS, but incorporate some principles and good stuff from other programs including Tier system, Pendulum System, Buffer System (from David Woodhouse) and Poliquin Principles.

The key element of FHP (Fuzzy Hypertrophy Program) is that everything (max strength, hypertrophy, isolation ,prehab, structural work) is done, but with variations during a mesocycle, thus providing variety and unload, while maintaining-improving everything. The length of mesocylce depends on your choice on using whole body or split system and the lasting of microcycles and their numbers. The choice is yours (like ever!).

One would ask, why is max strength a goal in FHP? Because, larger levels of strength allow for greater volume of hypertrophy work, because if you do bench press of 100kg for 10reps, with 1RM of 130kg, improving 1RM to 140kg will allow you to lift those 100kg more time, or to lift bigger load for 10 reps. Thus, maximal strength facilitate hypertrophy, and by the way, you will avoid „all show no go“ situation.

Structural/prehab work must be done to prevent muscles imbalances, but in the same time to facilitate improvements in max strength (and as a consequence a hypetrophy work and growth). It is well know that improving strength of rotator cuff, one can increase bench press but most importatly can avoid shoulder injuries. Injured bodybuilder cannot grow!

In FHP, there are three groups of exercises, their goals and their loads. Namely,

Exercise group-------------------Goal----------------Intensity
Core/main exercise…Max strength…1-5RM
Supplemental/auxilary exercises…Hypetrophy…5-10RM
Structural/Prehab exercises…Struc/prehab/isolation…10-15RM

I chose those intensities as a gude and not as „written in stone“, so you can change them on your will if you feel the need.

During one work-out, exercises are done with the same order: core/main, supplemental/auxilary, structural/prehab.

The emphasis on those exercises mentioned before, is switched during a mesocycle. The mesocycle lasts 3 microcycles (weeks in most cases) in this example, but you can choose different length.  The example meso template is as follows:

Microcycle #1
(structural emphasis)
Core/main exercises…4 sets @ 15% buffer
Supplemental/auxilary exercises…3 sets @ 10% buffer
Structural/Prehab exercises…2 sets @ 5% buffer (+testing for new RM)

Microcycle #2
(hypertrophy emphasis)
Core/main exercises…3 sets @ 10% buffer
Supplemental/auxilary exercises…2 sets @ 5% buffer (+testing for new RM)
Structural/Prehab exercises…4 sets @ 15% buffer

Microcycle #3
(max strength emphasis)
Core/main exercises…2 sets @ 5% buffer (+testing for new RM)
Supplemental/auxilary exercises…4 sets @ 15% buffer
Structural/Prehab exercises…3 sets @ 10% buffer

What the hell is buffer? Basically it means that the lifts are NOT done till failure. For example, if your 10RM bench press is 100kg, the 15%buff will be 85kg, or in other words you are going to lift 85kg for 10reps. If your 1RM of squat is 200kg, then with 15%buff, you are going to squat 170kg for one rep. Buffer facilitate great exercises form/technique, applies variations in intensities and prevent from over burning (overtraining). Buffer also provide variety!
Set weight = choosed_reps_RM * (100-buffer)/100

Exercises pools

First I would like to notice that I am not a proponent of machine/isolation work, nor abs/core work except using McGill Big Three and their variations. But for some bodybuilder isolation/machines can be done to develop certain part of the body. After all, I find myself as performance enhancer, not as an hypetrophic freak, but FHP tries to bridge this gap! 

Exercises pools depends on your choice on whole body or split system work-outs. Core/main exercises are mostly multy-joint, free weight exercises that recruit large muscle mass and have a need for great concentarion/coordination, so they are best done with smaller reps. Supplemetal exercises are simmilar to core, just are easier to do for larger reps. Supplemental exercises may include some isolation/machine work, DBs, one-leg exercises etc. Structural/prehab exercises mainly target smaller and usually not well developed muscles, but they can include some larger one in various movement patterns. 

This is example of exercise pool for whole body workout

Core/main exercises
Squats
DL
Bench press
Standing press
Bent over rows
Rows
Lat work

Supplemental/auxilary exercises
Curls
Pec flys
Triceps extention
Lunges
Step-up
Bulgarian squats
GHR
Reverse Hyper

Structural/Prehab exercises
Rotator cuff work
Flys
DB dorsiflexion
Shrughs
Ab work

This is just for example, so be free to modify it! For split system, exercies pools can be created for every body part, so I will let you do this, because it takes a lot of time, but I think it is not so important to do it!

Example week

If you chose whole body work-out, the following template can be used:

Mon
Squat
Bench
Rows

Bulgarians
Biceps curls
Rotator cuff

Wed
DL
Press
Latt pull down

Step-up
Triceps extentions
DB dorsiflexion

Fri
Squat
Bench
Rows

Bulgarians
Biceps curls
Rotator cuff

You can also choose this split system

Chest and back
Bench press
Rows

Pecs flys
Lat machine
Rear flys
Rotator cuff

Biceps and triceps
Standing curls
Triceps ext.

Preacher curl
Triceps pulldown
Fist work
Shrugs

OFF

Quads, hams, calves
Front squats
DL

Lunges
RDL
Hip work
DB dorsiflexion

OFF

You can also integrate whole body with split system! What? Remember that we said that „truth is a matter of a degree“? Well, you can use core/main exercises for body part, but cover the rest of the body with supplemental exercise. Then you got both! Your choice…

Progression and long term goals

I believe that till now everything should be pretty clear. Microcycle/week structure (read exercises) are repeated during whole mesocycle without changes. But, what after that...

For the athletes on FHP, I would suggest keeping core/main exercises SAME whole time, but every 1-3 mesocycles to change supplemental and prehab ones. Whole body should be worked out on each session. What the hell? Yes, they should be same, because abrupt changes in exercises and loads during a preparation or season (which is the worst case) can cause „adaptive stiffness“ as defined by Charlie Francis. Adaptive stiffnes is simmilar to DOMS but it also „drain“ C.A.R. (current adaptation reserve) neccesary for main training adaptation (sport practice), or in other words, athletes have left not enough of „adaptive energy“ to adapt to their sport practice which is detrimental. Also important to note is that DOMS is not a sign of muscle growth, but rather sign of tissue damage, which is NOT a prerequsite of muscle growth. Buffering and changes in supplemental exercises should provide enough variety for athletes, looking for performance improvements. Also, olys and other DE stuff should be done with within athlete training. In that situation,  exercise pool should be changed. But on this topic in some other article. In mean time, I suggest looking into Tier system by Joe Kenn, which is one of the best system I saw for athletes (with little modifications). Try implementing mentioned buffering in it and you have yoursefl a comprehensive program!
Others, looking only to hypertrophy without any other important training can play much more with variations. Changes can be done every mesocycle, but I would keep the same micro structure because of easier load calculations etc. Here are couple of suggestions how to provide some variety ang growth:
  1. Switch between whole body and split system. You can implement both approaches as described earlier. Also play with circle and stage types. Implement them both! For example you can do body part with core/main exercise in stage-like arrangement, but cover the rest of the body with ciruit type training with supplemental and prehab work.

  2. Change core exercises every mesocycle, and supplemental every other, or vice versa

  3. Play with rep schemes

  4. Try doing DE with core exercises once in a while.

  5. You can also include advanced methods, like:
    * Agonist/antagonist supersets
    * Post-fatigue supersets (compound + isolation)
    *Pre-fatigue supersets (isolation + compund)
    *8x3 method
    *Tempo contrast
    *1 ½’s
    *Dynamic/isometric contast
    *Cluster sets
    *Complex (max + reps)

  6. You can also try to lift same weight one rep more each week. You can also try doing drop off, extended 5’s, back-off, but those methods are done till failure, so be reserved with this methods. The reason why I avoid doing sets to failure is because they are example of „diminishing returns“, thus they bring only small improvement comapred to sets with 1-2 reps in reserve, but impose greater risk of injury, strain, DOMS, „energy drain“, CNS fatigue and fatigue in general and overburning!

  7. „Everything is done only the volume varies“. This does not mean that everything should be done at each training, but rather in one microcycle. So, be free to create one day just with core/main exercises, one day with supplemental work and one with prehab movements for recovery and injury prevention. This depends on your ability to recover

  8. Vary the number of exercises per exercise group (core/main, suppl, prehab) in each workout. You can start with 3, and after some time done only 1 exercise for exercise group…

In the ending…

The purpose of this article is not to really present „written in stone“ program, but rather to „free your mind“, thus creating critical thinking and opend mind approach. It is a pattern which you can use with gross modifications, and you can implement/change other methods/programs into it using fuzzy logic and CSS. Look at it as a introduction to fuzzy logic and CSS and their usage in strength training/bodybuilding!
I hope you liked the article, and learned that things are not „black and white“ in training! The most important, I hope that I stimulated you to think criticaly and to develop your own methods. As Charlie Francis stated: „There is a lot of ways to skin a cat!“.

I hope you can read this, because I had some freakin’ problems “transforming” tables into raw text…
Any questions, suggestions welcome! Enjoy…

Excellent post!

Peter.

I am kind of confused to how fuzzy logic applies to this article. If you are refering to fuzzy logic as a combination of systems (without a boolean acceptance or lack thereof of their tenets) to produce an optimized hybrid system, then it is more of a genetic algorithms approach than fuzzy logic. I know this sounds like semantic giberish, but there is a precise difference (and some proffs that i know would kill me for not pointing it out :).)

As far as i understand it, fuzzy logic is primarily used as a controller with maxims.
e.g.
If athlete’s response to training is X and current state is Y then do Z
If athlete’s …

where X and Y and Z are multi-dimensional fuzzy sets.

then as the athletes training commences the coach observes the Z’s, modifies the maxims, continues through the process. In many ways FL is a very organic process (if done correctly) and similar to how elite coaches adapt an athlete’s training effectively on the fly.

PS: if i have any errors in the above, let me know.

Well writtten.

Are you suggesting testing RM’s for Supplemental/auxilary exercises & Structural/Prehab exercises??? :confused:

I belive this is a flaw in this article! You are right quick…
It is “dangerous” testing RM for lunge or RDL, becuase if you fall during a lunge you fall on your side, which is, I think, the worst that can happen… So, instead of RM testing for auxilary and prehab exercises, you can test a RM-1, or try to lift little heavier weight without loosing technique, falling, without greater emotional arousal, fatigue etc… I hope you know what I mean!

You are nitpicking :slight_smile: but you are right… Here is a part from Fuzzy Logic toolbox manual from MATLAB HELP

Fuzzy logic has two different meanings. In a narrow sense, fuzzy logic is a
logical system, which is an extension of multivalued logic. But in a wider sense,
which is in predominant use today, fuzzy logic (FL) is almost synonymous with
the theory of fuzzy sets, a theory which relates to classes of objects with
unsharp boundaries in which membership is a matter of degree. In this
perspective, fuzzy logic in its narrow sense is a branch of FL. What is important
to recognize is that, even in its narrow sense, the agenda of fuzzy logic is very
different both in spirit and substance from the agendas of traditional
multivalued logical systems.

In this article I used FL as an example of multivalued logic, thus if you ask if hypertophy is done in in 1st week, the answer would be .5. I wanted to give an example that eerything is a matter of a degree (continuum form 0 to 1), and for this resons I used FL!
I programmed one thermostat that control room temperaure in Simulink using Fuzzy logic toolbox (FIS - fuzzy interference system), and I know what you mean… I believe that coach as a control system that controls the athlete preparation process can be viewed as an very complex fuzzy expert system, but this is an another topic, which will be carried out in my next article (when I translae and update my seminar work that I have done on serbian). I hope you get my point here quark! BTW, I am glad that I can discuss about this with you! Tnx

I know i am nitpicking. :slight_smile: I definately like the approach of the article. Viewing the coach as a complex controller is a concept that i am interested in. I have heard some interesting arguments that human intellegence is merely a very high capacity large pattern classifier. This makes sense as humans only have a finite amount of sensory bandwidth. This, combined with some of the implications of Godel’s theorems, is making traditional AI research a bit nervous. Keep the discussion coming, i enjoy talking about this stuff.

Quark, have you read “Dynamic patterns” from Kelso? Neither am I, but my motor control teacher have recomended me this book…
On the contrary, I believe that “human soul” (I am proponent of dualism) cannot be simulated… I have wrote an article about this but it is on serbian… As soon as I find some time I will translate all my stuff on english, so be patient, because I am going to finish faculty in april!!!

Would you employ/recommend such a regime to any level of athletes?
Thanks!

Nice question… thanks!
I belive that classical sequential/linear approach is the best when working with begginers and low level athletes (which I have wrote in the article). Sequential approach (2-3 weeks of structure, 3-4 hypetrophy etc.) is great because allows for skill acquisition and progressive increase in load during time, but…
As soon as athlete reach some “optimal” (and what is optimal? this is discusible) level of preparadness and master the technique, I believe that conjugate/complex method and CSS are superior! Conjugate/complex method can be used only if the number of goals (factors, abilities) are not larger that 2-3 (but this depends on athlete ability to adapt larger number of stimuly-Zatsiorsky: S&P ST) like in Westside, but if we are talking about complex motor “enviroment” defined by sport requirements, then CSS is far more superior for advanced athletes, but this is just mine opinion!

I haven’t read it. What is its emphasis? I haven’t had time to ready much of the biomechanics/physiological stuff as my research leans more toward perception and system identification.

If you are interested in the “human soul”-type stuff, then you might be interested in the book “On intelligence” (i will find a link to it, i forget who the author was. I don’t agree with all of it, (it is kind of sensational) but very interesting. It is a great book for starting discussions. THere is some other stuff, by Sir Alistair Macfarlane, but i don’t remember the titles that comes to mind as well.

The progression for a begginer using this method would be:

1st phase
Goal:Technique learning, reinforcements of training habits, motivation, structural adaptation (ligaments, tendons etc) etc
Methods: Larger number of exercises, various “angles” worked, various movement patterns, circuit type training
Loads:
3-4x5 reps with 30-60secs rest for core/main
15-20 reps for auxilary & prehab
Buffer is extra large, at least 5 or even more reps till failure

[u]2nd phase[/u]
Goal: Ligament, tendons preparation, hypetrophy work, technique
Methods: Medium number of exercises. Core exercises in stage organisation, suppl/auxilary & prehab circuit organisation
Load:
3-4x(2-3x5) reps with 45-75sec rest between small sets, and 90-120sec between larger sets for core/main exercises
12-15 reps for suppl & prehab
Buffer is slighty reduced, but there is 3-5 reps till failure

3rd phase
Goals: Hypertrophy work, ligaments and tendon work
Methods: Smaller number of exercises. Stage arrangement for every exercise
Load:
3-4x(1-2x5reps) with 60-90 sec rest between small sets, and 120-180 sec between larger for core/main exercises
3-4x8-12 reps for suppl & prehab (60-120 rest)
Buffer is about 2-3 reps till failure

4th phase
Goals: Max strength, hypertophy
Methods: Describeb in article
Loads: Described in article

I used 2-3x5 with small rest with core ex. instead of 15reps, because I believe that squats and DL and other “complex” exercises are better learned with smaller reps. Also, I believe that circuit like arrangement with begginers can induce faster skill acqqquisition, because it forces them to “remeber” exercise (to find it in long ter memory and put it in medium/working one) every circle! After this phase, larger reps could be used with more complex exercises but I would avoid going over 12! I used this approach with my girlfriend, but her work capacity was so low that she could do only one circuit, thus stage! but anyway, she is doing great, and just befor 1h, she done 4x8 reps with 20kg DL! (I know it is very low, but fortunally she loves doing DL) :slight_smile:
Dont bother with the progression presented here, because it is just my current thoughts!

Try looking for Kelso at Amazon and Google! He research paralels between chaos/complexity and human mind… very, very interesting…
As for human soul and mathematics, I have read Fritjof Capra “Tao of physics”, and Roger Penrose “Emperor new mind” and a lot of other books on psychology/mistics. I belive that you and me quark should start special thread named “Quark and duxx come back to earth” to discuss out topics and leave this “ordinary terrestrials” alone with our stuff :slight_smile:

Excellent post…I have often thought if genetic algorithms FS and neural nets could be used as decision tools in coaching. How about an expert system software, based on Charlie’s training principles knowledge and experience. Imagine how helpful that could be… Imagine a cybernatic Charlie Francis that you could consult with very specific queries about your own training or an athlete you coach? You would then get your answer almost instantly.

What a dream… of course we have the website.

Would you consider re-arranging the order of Core/Main vs. Auxiliary/Supplementary exercises for the 1st (-2nd?) phase(s) of training in accordance with your goals and for this level of athletes?
What do you think?

I dont get you… do you mean exercise order in one training session? I belive that everything should be adapted to specific situations…
Anyway… you may keep core/main exercises like 3-4x5reps (with normal rest) but with xxl buff, and hit structural goals (phase 1 & 2) with supplemental and prehab exercises… Numerous posibilities!
I hope you got your point here… But correct if I aint’. thanks

Not you too :slight_smile:
The issue here is example of CSS in strength training, which is, on my opinion, simmilar to multyvalued logic (FZ), or in other word “everything is done only the volume/emphasis varies” is very simmilar with “the truth is a matter of a degree”! “Degree” and “volume/emphasis” in those two quotes are synonims in this example!
There is an issue that “coach” can be simulated, or created as analogic, isomorphic etc as fuzzy logic expert system, but this is out of topic for this thread (I think). I have desire to translate one my work in which I stated that coach cannot be modeled/simmulated, because AI dont have “creativity” and “free will”, but currently I dont have timo to do this…
And, I believe tha OmegaWave is a example of expert system which gives you recomendatins what should be done, but pakewi should talk about this…

Interesting stuff. I know of ES in stock market trading whuch have elements of supervised and unsupervised training, but I suppose an unsupervised system would bring in more degree s of freedom and also lead to the system acting differently from the expert/coach it was originally modelled on. Intersting stuff DUXX.

DUXX would you say that the top coaches are consistently successful because of creativity or because of the ability to discipline themselves NOT to be too creative? I don’t know… very interesting…

Hmmmm :confused: :confused:
I belive that the word game is in issue here… Creative doesnt mean that the coach should experiment something in random manner, but instead to adapt the situation and solve some problem in new way… And I believe that creativity is not in algorithm nature and thus it cannot be simulated! It is exclusive right of living things, and what is “alive” is another issue here and way out of topic for this thread…
Martn, do you want to join “Quark, duxx and martn come back to earth please” thread :slight_smile: We will be soon opening a club/subforum for cybernetic/mathematic freaks :smiley: