I’ve got that one too. I think bodybuilder Shawn Ray is on the cover.
That’s correct. Just click the link I posted and you’ll see. My copy is buried somewhere and I’ve been having trouble locating it, so I just ordered a new one.
There’s also a great article in there about Joe Horrigan’s soft tissue method, which is essentially ART before his former partner Mike Leahy trademarked the name. This is about 7 years before Kim Goss’s article in MM2K put ART on the industry map.
One aspect about that article in particular was inaccurate according to Charlie himself.
The article indicated that Ben dropped cleans in 1985 because Charlie “felt he was pulling them to far away from his body.”
Charlie said that Ben had not attemped cleans for a number of years prior to that though he did not say exactly how long it had been.
Ben was not a great technician when it came to cleans but according to Charlie it did not matter. He did them anyway and was strong at no matter what he did.
Merlene Ottey for example apparently did very little lifting at all at least to his knowledge.
To answer your own questions based on the information you have learned here, the people you have learned from and continue to build relationships with others in the field from those out achieving results.
Charlie was the first person to say he did not know everything but he knew enough to go to the ones getting the job done and asking the right questions.
Yes - the same would go for Tim and Marion. I could remember asking them to demonstrate their power clean technique when they were up at York University. Charlie and I winced when we saw one rep of their technique (or lack thereof). Charlie instantly decided to eliminate that exercise from the program. Too much risk, not enough reward. They were high level athletes that were able to get more out of a general lifting program, relying on med-ball throws for much of their explosive work.
If there technique was adequate, would he have kept them in there for long? I’m thinking along the lines of where they fall on the force-time curve and high level athletes.
Damn, sorry to hear this, I haven’t posted on this board in a while and I just found out about it today. Nature is cruel at times.
That’s a good question. The lifts may have been included for more general reasons (i.e. CNS stimulation) as part of the big picture. At the time, their block starts were very good and they demonstrated exceptional rate of force delivery in other activities (i.e. med-ball throws and jumps). So it could be argued that Olympic lifts were not necessary for these particular athletes.
Just my little experience today:my athletes performed wonderfully, and I told them that my discovery of Charli ewebsite and writings in 2001 is what started all for me as a coach.before, I referred to sprinters like those who were used to get strains, pulls, and muscle tears constantly…till they break at young age and they are gone…Thank you Charlie again.
I have a DVD of Charlie talking at SWIS.
I don’t know if that’s the same talk everyone has been mentioning, but I thought it was great. I learned a lot from it. I’m not one of those people who needs something illustrated with Power Point to find it worth my attention. I’m not saying anyone else here is, either, but a lot of people in this world are. Clarity is always good, but Charlie always seemed extremely clear to me. And even if he weren’t, if Charlie’s talking, I’ll do what I need to do to follow it.
Charlie started out by saying, “It looks like a lot of people are interested in what I’m going to say. I’m kind of curious myself.” He was always funny.
There are so few clear, independent thinkers in the world. The type of people who say things that are extremely obvious, but they’re only obvious after these people say them. Before these people say the obvious things, everyone else is “often wrong, never in doubt.”
It’s terrible to lose someone like that.
I was once involved in a discussion on here, and I made a few posts, and someone asked Charlie a question, and Charlie told the questioner to read one of my posts. A very, very small thing, but man, was I happy about it. I told a few friends about it.
I never met Charlie, and I’m not in track, but I definitely feel a loss. My sympathies to those who knew him.
“I never met Charlie, and I’m not in track, but I definitely feel a loss. My sympathies to those who knew him.” ( unknowon)
“Sounds like you knew him better than you think.
And he only spoke once at the conference in Toronto.” Ange
Ange,
that would be nice but don’t feel you have to do everything all at once and by yourself. You have been through an awful lot lately so take your time and ensure you and James are getting (and asking for) support.
Hear Hear John.
RIP. I’ve learned many things for here even though im still very slow.
Derek, I remember being at York with some college football players I trained. Charlie made me do all the med ball work with them. I am a pretty explosive person and he said to us all " You know, Marion throws the med ball further than all of you". Man, what a reality check. Always good with a quip that guy. All I know is we will never see another Charlie Francis in our lifetimes. Let’s all be thankful for the time he spent helping us become better at what we do. I know he is personally responsible for a few hundred thousand in my earnings over the past decade.
Yes - I remember her med-ball throws well. I have them on video somewhere. Need to dig that up. She threw the ball once and I turned to Charlie and said, “How heavy is that ball?”, expecting him to say 3kg (7lbs). He said it was 5kg (11lbs) as it flew across the infield.
I asked her sheepishly, “So, I guess you are close to dunking a basketball?” She looked at me like I was an idiot and said, “Oh yeah, I can dunk. I could dunk it in high school. There were about 3-4 girls in our class that could dunk.”
So, you can guess that I felt thoroughly emasculated after that day of training.
Thanks for that quote. Wise words for future coaches.
Please do, and post them if you have rights to do so. I would like to see this.