Cathy Stands Up For Axed Coaches

Freeman fumes at sackings
By Mike Hurst
March 18, 2005

CATHY Freeman has been highly critical of the :eek: retrenchment of Australia’s 23 full-time professional athletics coaches - including her former personal coach Peter Fortune - describing the purge as “outrageous”.

Following the $1.3million loss declared by Athletics Australia in 2003 and a review of the sport, the board and new CEO Danny Corcoran decided partly as a cost-saving measure not to renew the contracts of coaches working in the State Institute of Sport network.

This is expected to save AA about $600,000 in the coming year. A smaller team to the world championships in Helsinki might also save up to $200,000 on some previous campaigns.

But while the Australian Sports Commission and other peak sports bodies may be pleased AA is righting its ship, the expedient move to reduce costs has potentially dire consequences for the development of the talent pool of competitors as well as coaches.

Certainly the timing of the purge is poor. We are 362 days away from the Melbourne Commonwealth Games - the first home Commonwealth Games since 1982.

Freeman, 32, who was guided by Fortune to win the Sydney Olympic 400m gold medal, two world championships and Commonwealth titles, is dismayed the coaches have been sacrificed.

“I’d caught up with ‘Fort’ just before I left for London and he told me the news. I had my breath taken away from me,” Freeman told The Daily Telegraph yesterday. "He’d played such a huge role in my life. I took it [Fortune’s retrenchment] personally.

“I’m not quite sure about the technicalities, the thinking of management behind this decision to let the coaches go, but I know people are our most important resource. Someone like Fort being dismissed this way … it gives out a very negative message, doesn’t it?”

One message is that anyone contemplating a career in coaching the premier Olympic sport should forget it.

Another message to aspiring elite athletes is that from now on your future is back in the hands of part-time hobby coaches, some of whom are competent but you take what you get.

“It’s such a tough job to coach and bring out the best in people,” Freeman said. "I would like to know some answers.

"Fort has lost his livelihood there at the Victorian Institute of Sport.

"From where I stand I found it quite a surprise.

"The future of the sport is in the hands of these wonderful people - the coaches. They’re out there all day managing people, managing dreams and aspirations.

"It’s important for me to remain objective. But I just don’t understand what’s in the minds of people who make these decisions.

"Fort’s skills, experience and his knowledge can’t be found in a text book. You’ve got to experience it.

"It could be perceived as an outrageous and very controversial decision.

“To send someone with that much experience and such passion away doesn’t make sense.”

Asked at the recent Australian championships how he would develop the current crop of teen track stars in the absence of the fulltime coaches, AA’s national performance manager Max Binnington said: “If I had a magic wand, I’d work that out.”

On hearing that sorry response, Freeman said: "A magic wand? That’s not a real answer. We’re talking about the experience and the richness of our sport.

"I hope I don’t ever respond with that kind of answer. I don’t mean to attack anybody. But people need to take more responsibility and provide answers.

“We have to be careful we don’t lose these young people’s imagination and heart to other sports.”

wtf, this IS ridiculous!!!

You miss the point. While the coaches are out busting their asses, the bureaucrats are deciding who shall pay for the losses caused by their own incompetence. Since, by definition, they won’t decide against themselves, they’ll sack the coaches who’ve been far too busy all along to effectively resist institutional stupidity or to defend themselves.

You don’t sack yourself, do you.

Coaches in Australia are expected to become more professional, this might work when the major senior body gets there backside into gear.

Max Binnington has said in reply to a question about where the talent will come from and improve - I would like to have a magic wand.

It seems that AA thinks that athletes like Cathy, Jana and Dimitri happen.

The top talent, may make it to the top, but it is the levels below that force them to improve that is as important.

I might move to some Pacific Island and be ranked number 1 in some event.

It’s a shame man, especially the fact that many of the potential athletes are giving the sport up due to dodgy coaching - in particular those part-time hobby men. I almost left the sport because of this just a few weeks ago - glad I found a new coach - because plenty of them simply don’t care. They don’t see what great blobs of clay they have to mould - you can have a Rodin coach or, well something else - unfortunately most of them fuck the model up…

Into gear? There’s never a shortage of gearboxes in sports administration!
They’re always putting on a show of change, since what they did before is an obvious disaster, and charging off in every direction except the right one!
Floundering organizers can’t be left to decide on their own course of remedial action! They couldn’t figure it out before, so why the hell would any sensible person think they can be left to figure it out now?
They have to be TOLD what needs to be done by those who’ve actually done it, and they need their feet held to the fire till it’s done!

I actually have just given up coaching, as I don’t have the time to commit to coaching. I have been very fortunate to have good coaches, that are now friends, and all are “hobby coaches” - but the biggest difference is they care.

My aim as a coach is to help develop the best person in all aspects.

I seem to remember that the UKs system for developing new sporting talent is based on the Ozzy system. Hopefully, we won’t be following thier lead with this new development :smiley: Not that i’m even sure if we have 23 full time coaches in the uk!

I may be nieve but a $1.3m loss seems like peanuts for a government funded initative (i am assuming it is government funded), though i guess it all comes down to what the total budget was to start with. I only say this because my dad’s government project is currently £3billion over budget!

And isn’t running over budget a management issue not the responsability of the coaches? Perhaps they should find $1.3m in the management budget or at least pool thier creative management minds and figure out some new marketing initatives to help raise the extra money they require?

All these models come from Canada- THE model for bureaucrats everywhere, as no country has ever come close to spending so much as a relative percentage on bureaucrats.

The loss is effectively 15% of the organisations turnover.

I am not sure of beaucrats (government) are the problems. The sport is expensive and funding is pretty much results based. When Athletics is competing against swimming, beach volleyball and the like.

From my point it seems that multiple eras of AA have put the majority of there efforts into the elite (medal or likely medal winners) at the reduction of supporting the classes under.

Effectively they have spent on the money and building blocks on the top and not much on the bottom. An upside down Pyramid.

I as an athlete/coach/lover of this sport the only affect on me will be the costs associated with competing.

Athletics is not the only sport to look crap in Australia, Football (Soccer) has undergone huge changes.

In most developed countries with regional affiliates it is those affiliates (States & Territories) who bear full responsibility for catering to the club strata of registered competitors. Usually it is a bylaw of the administrative structure that the federal body keeps their “filthy hands” off the grass-roots mass participation base of the sport. I suspect inquiries will reveal this is the case as regards the national body in Australia.
Far be it from me to go against the flow here, but I do believe it is Athletics Australia’s primary role to co-ordinate and drive the international effort, so perhaps their concentration on the “elite” peak of the participation pyramid is in fact their brief and principle responsibility?

DMA - And Basketball? The history making grand final on the weekend bumped over to delayed broadcast on Fox Sports for TWO regular season rugby games. Huh? Yeah, I guess at least basketball games are delayed by a few hours - not the 2 week delay of athletics. :frowning: I like the idea a few of the athletes put forward of live telecasts of the Melbourne Grand Prix and/or the National Champs. I mean it would be ONE night every YEAR, they can give us that - can’t they? Evidently not.

Whose idea was it to change the invitational meet structure?

tHE Pacific Island guys are pretty fast. Like 10.4, 46, 50. 400IH, so your faster than that?

I am a former Hammer Thrower - Kelsey.

KitKat. I agree and understand. But some talk I heard was that AA was quite willing to take over the running of the state/regionals bodies.

As the states have to pay to fees to AA and AA is, for my state, is the major sponsor it creates problems.

I’m not saying it is right. There are some extremely smart and talented members on the board of AA.

But if you don’t have the base right it collapses and the whole of the sport is in trouble.

The sport will survive and has the past 4 years with the money issues.

It is with interested that the former CEO was also the former CEO of Swimming Australia when going through there bad patch. I think swimming is now going okay.

Athletics

Eight-year hurdle

By MIKE HURST Athletics Writer

March 25, 2005

AUSTRALIAN athletics will take at least eight years to recover from the coaching purge brought about by the financial crisis that has hit the sport.

That’s the warning from Peter Bowman, one of the most respected coaches in the country as president of the Australian Track & Field Coaches Association.

Former Olympic champion Cathy Freeman has already expressed her dissatisfaction with the move to terminate 23 contracted coaches attached to the cash-strapped Athletics Australia on March 31.

Athletics Australia finally handed its coaching plan, part of it’s annual $5.5 million submission, to the Australian Sports Commission this week but the damage that has been done is severe, says Bowman.

“It’s a real worry – and not just for the year leading up to the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne next March,” Bowman told The Daily Telegraph. "Everyone is sympathetic towards the new administration at AA because they have taken over this huge loss [$1.3million].

"But these coaches are lost. They won’t come back. It will be another eight years before we get back on track. That’s my opinion.

“Four years goes like a flash, the time from the Sydney Olympics to Athens was gone in a blink.”

Bowman said he was very concerned about the destabilisation of coaches working in the State Institute of Sport system as a result of the cost-cutting move that will save AA about $600,000 in the coming year.

“We’re in dire straits” Bowman lamented.

“I’m convinced AA threw the baby out with the bath water. Keith Connor [AA’s head coach from 2001 until December 2004] did a very good job, but he stirred people up because he didn’t take any bullshit. That’s the impression I got from reliable people around the place.”

Connor was given no encouragement and therefore did not apply for the job of high performance director, which replaced the head coach role in a restructure of the sport undertaken following a review last year in the aftermath of AA’s record loss in 2002-2003.

Other prominent coaches now out of work include Freeman’s mentor Peter Fortune at the Victorian Institute of Sport, Michael Khmel at NSWIS (where he coached four of the six-member Athens Olympic silver medal winning 4x400m relay squad) and American throwing coach Steve Lemke at the Queensland Academy of Sport.

Some coaches, such as Rudolf Sopko and Nicole Boegman will be employed within the SIS system as strength coaches or program co-coordinators – but any coaching of athletes will be done in their own time.

AA’s new chief executive Danny Corcoran said his group was doing its best with a reduced budget.

“We’ve cut our office staff at AA from 36 down to 19. It comes down to a matter of priorities,” he said.

Well, let’s see what AA has planned for us…

But there’s always money for military programs right???..sacrifice sport for the Iraq mission right?