Trindon has been working with LSU head strength coach for football. So I’m sure he’s doing a shit load of volume and plenty of 110’s.
Just to prove how bullshits are those times, I timed 5 times spiller and 5 times best… and always got an average 7-8 hundreths faster fo Spiller…will try some few times later.
Was the surface not painted 2 years ago?Maybe slippering also…
Would still love to see again NFL fastest men over 60Y…would put all on jacoby ford.
I disagree. That is the way he has always run. Weeks after football last year he “showed up” and ran under 6.6x early in the track season if i recall correctly. And he has also run 6.6 in high school.
Funny you mention the Jets. There was a member here who was a Asst SC coach for the jets. He loved charlies stuff but could not do any of it with the players cuz of politics… It would have got him in hot water with the head SC coach for the jets at the time… I guess the good coaches not only do things right but also do the right thing for the athletes…
When you say they’re timed manually, are you implying that two different people react and start their respective timing system when the athlete first moves?
Why don’t they just use a Brower hand pad to start? Wouldn’t that standardize all results?
No one would know how to use it. Maybe it could be one of the player intelligence tests.
Lol. :)Mortac…
It’s a bit sad to see the world’s richest sport going on with unaccurate data collection.
Taylor Mays combine freak 230lbs unofficial 4.24 with one run to go!!
Those individuals who provide the ‘unofficial’ times that you’ll notice on TV, if you watched the combine footage on NFL network, are using stop watches.
There are two different individuals manually starting a Brower system and an older system (can’t remember the name). So even the electronic systems are started manually.
A touch pad would pose much too great a logistical problem due to the sensitivity of the pad.
I speak from experience regarding teams I’ve coached at the high school level as well as this one.
My preferred method of timing is an electronic timing gate system in which the starting gate is wired as a ‘reverse gate’. In this way, the system does not start until the beam is connected. The athlete starts in the gate, breaking the beam, and when the athlete leaves the gate the beam connects and the timer starts.
I don’t actually have a system like this; however, I spoke with a company that makes various timing systems and offers such an option.
This would provide for fully automatic times, void of human error; although reaction time is not a factor so these times could not be accurately compared to T&F times.
4.24 with shitty tech!!!
Holy Shit!!
That is unbelievable.
Someone teach and make this guy cover just a little and he will be all-time.
Tom Shaw guy Mr. Rolle unofficial 4.69!!!
Shitty tech, all power!!
Can’t wait to watch it tonight. Dude is just RAW!
If he relax on this next 40, he will go 4.18.
Second 40: 4.34…
James: Espn’s Lynn Pasquerella rated Doring Dickerson as the athlete that helped himself the most so far in the draft. He thinks he will be used like Chris Cooley as an H-Back
Wow, official 4.43… NFL timing issues.
Wouldn’t the fact that the timers have to react to the athlete’s first movement negate the reaction time recorded in a T&F sprint?
I’m having a hard time grasping the fact that Jacoby Ford and Trindon Holliday, both 6.55 or faster for 60m, didn’t record faster times.
This can probably be explained as:
-They aren’t training with the people who got them to 6.5s in the 60m
-They haven’t been competing and simply aren’t in 6.5 shape at this moment. They have both typically opened up 6.6high-6.7 and then dropped time after getting in races and getting in better shape for the 60m.
-The 40s are essentially handtimed and quite inaccurate and imprecise (as in, there are large variations in addition to being inaccurate)
-A lot of guys have good 30m or so ability even if they don’t run track and most of the truly fast guys in the NFL can probably run 6.7-6.8 first time out (most of these guys ran track in HS and went 10.6-10.9 anyway, which is close to that, combined with the fact they have relatively better acceleration anyway). Even some questionable S&C programs do a fairly good job of getting people to run a fairly fast 30m. Not 6.3-6.5 60m caliber acceleration, but better than would be expected because of the nature of their training and the fact they are very gifted, IMO. Very few are going to be in 6.5 shape, even if they were doing track in college, but it is quite reasonable to think many would be in the 6.7s and even 6.6s when fresh and after some races if they dedicated themselves for 2-3 months when healthy.