He was always a 200m athlete circa 2004. With a windy 20.95 heat time and 21.10w final behind Luke Mansfield 20.79w u20 Aust Champs.
He went missing for a while (told by a certain head relay coach that he was not professional enough) and returned running 100s. The emphasis may have been to lower his 10.70 to a faster time and return to the 200m.
At the end of the day he is finally running 200s again and the times are relevant to his 100m improvements. 400s are way to far for him. Stick with 200s and get selected every year if you run sub 20.65 or bust your ass year in year out and run 10.30 and never get picked in a national team.
Which way looks brighter?