Carl Lewis was a ridiculously good long jumper in high school. He wasn’t ‘bold enough to try it’, as he was already a jumper/sprinter before he got to the top.
In 1982 Carl jumped so far, that it looked like he went over 9 meters. It is in his biography and the same story has been told by others elsewhere. The referee put up a red flag so the jump was never measured. But there was no dent in the plastacine, it was to the millimeter. The fact is, it was his one perfect jump, and the computer graphic lines super imposed over the pit, suggested a jump of 9.28 meters.
The proof that Carl was so good is that a lot of people wont believe what I’ve just said. Every long jumper has their Beamon’esque moment, (Mike Powel in 1991) and Carl had his in 1982. 9.28meters is the unofficial greatest leap ever, whether you believe it or not.
I don’t believe 9.28m. Can you please point me to an article with verifiable & justified evidence of this? My not believing is not proof that Carl is that good. It’s proof I don’t believe he jumped 9.28m. Not every jumper has a Beamon-esque moment. Non of Lewis, Saladino, Pedroso, or Myricks had any legal mark that was considerably further than their next best.
I was told by witnesses that it was over 30 ft (James has my calculator so you translate it to metric!)
No doubt Lewis was/is the greatest long jumper but Bolt is the greatest sprinter.
Tom Tellez said (at the AT&FCA conference) that Carl could never be a coach as he hasn’t the temperment for it, and would be lucky to last two weeks.
Like Goose said, Tellez confirmed that Lewis was that good and such a perfectionist that he often got frustrated with others and was difficult to get along with.
I tend to agree with Goose as an athlete who was at one stage clearly was the best in the world at 100, 200 and the long jump, and over such a long period of time, in several major championships, Lewis was one of the greatest T&F athletes of all time.
If I was pressed to name my top ten T&F athletes of all time I’d probably have Lewis at number one.
I thought Hay (biomechanist) got ahold of the Lewis jump video and claimed it was like 8.80 or something. He scoffed at the 30’ claim. I think it’s on youtube somewhere. I will find it if you send me cupcakes. Anyway, there are plenty of guys who hammered 9m+ jumps either slight fouls or wind aided or both. There is a jump where Pedroso is clearly well beyond 9m but it’s a foul…again on youtube.
My view is that Carl had the levers and elastic strength to run faster than his pbs. Toms methods are good but I think in terms of developing acceleration and max vel there are deficiencies in his approach.
No doubt Carl could of run faster but so could of Ben.
He was running and jumping in to a sand pit in his back garden at the age of four. I have read his auto-biography and probably know even more about him than you do. He was ‘bold’ from the age of four, five or six, is what I meant. I didn’t mean that he suddenly got the idea as an adult, to try both events. i eman he was bold enough and self-believing enough even as a young child to know exactly what path he wanted. But his path was very focused. By the time of his high school years, he got a tape measure, and measured 8.90 meters in his back garden, just to see what it looked like. he also sowed the numbers: “27 feet” or something on the back of his jacket which he wore to school every day. when classmates asked him what it meant, he told them he’d be the high school kid that would jump over 27 feet in the long jump. Nobody believed he’d do it, but himself.
For you to suggest he discovered his talent, and was “allready” this and that is wrong, because no matter how good he was in his teens, he’d allways planned everything before-hand, long before he started prooving it on the field. I’d say he was bold, the epitomy of “reaching goals” is Carl Lewis. He’s not the ‘fell out of the womb and broke the junior record’ kind of athlete. He was just very driven. He was running and jumping in to a sand pit at age four, and actually visualizing the track & field version of the long jump.
He was bold all his life, which is why he became a very good jumper early on in his life. He didn’t discover his talent by “accident” as so many other sprinters claim of their own talents. Carl was driven, his elder brothers and sisters were more athletic than he was (for a while) and his parents were ofcourse, track coaches. Eventually, after 12 years of training, he starting getting very good, by the time he was 16 years old.
It doesn’t matter that you don’t believe it. Also, I can’t be arsed to fax you a copy of the literature from a sports biography (and even if I were to, you could Claim Carl lewis was biased.)
It’ll be easier if you just dissagree and don’t believe me, instead of me going and finding the articles and sources.
You probably also wouldn’t believe that one of my basketball team mates triple jumped 17 meters (without a full-time training schedule) , of the back of very little triple jump training, and when he was about twenty years old, because I can’t proove it.
You may also disbelieve that Deion Saunders was out-running the adults in weakend football games, when he was eight years old, because I can’t proove it.
I also can’t proove to you that a personal experiment in self hypnosis, pulled a muscle (without contracting the muscle). Admittedly, I was not aiming for a ‘pulled’ muscle.
Yes, that’s the problem with not getting credit for the LJ. You have no proof of what you could have done regardless of the reality.
The other point here is you can’t have it both ways. Carl started training at age 4 and according to Steve Davis, a Clemson guy who went to his HS, he ran 9.3y ht at 16. Carl then claimed Ben had no talent because he wasn’t that fast at a young age yet Ben didn’t start training- or growing till- almost 15 and had a lot of catching up to do on a 10 year head start. Of course Ben was behind initially but improved to 10.21m E by the end of HS.
I mean, you have been known to outright make-up stuff on this forum and you have never seen video of the jump, nor have most of the people claiming it was 9.28m, hence the reason why people don’t believe it.
You seem to have stuck your foot in your mouth once again:
The next day it seemed Indianapolis was intent on robbing him, as it did last year. This was, you will recall, the place where, in the 1982 Sports Festival, Lewis made a jump that some estimated to be 30 feet, only to have officials rule that even though he’d left no mark on the Plasticine that is used to detect a foul jump, his toe had broken the imaginary plane at the end of the board. Thus the sand was ordered swept before the jump could be measured. No such plane-breaking rule exists; the international and American rule books speak only of touching the ground beyond the end of the board. But the sand had been swept.
Note that Kenny Moore wrote that article in 1983. It’s not like somebody just made it up.
That Carl made an outrageous jump (and that meet officials made an equally outrageous screw up) at the 1982 Sports Festival in Indianapolis is not open to dispute. Too many people of high reputation saw it, and Charlie apparently knows some of them–no surprise. The only point open to dispute is how far over 30 feet it was.
You might consider learning what the hell you’re talking about before you go around attacking people.
That’s my point about the situation. There is absolutely no doubt it was a huge jump and also absolutely no doubt the officials had no right to sweep the sand after finding no mark in the plasticine because that’s what it’s there for. Now those who don’t like Carl will diminish the jump and those who do might exagerate it.
No one would accuse me of being a Carl lover but I’m still sure it was just over 30ft based on my info. Credit where credit is due.
The only reason he jumped over 30ft mark was that he never steped on the board or plastecine but over it and that is why there was no mark in the plasticine and that is also the reason why he could land so far :rolleyes:
There was video footage of the jump on youtube a year or two ago, but I was unable to find it when trying today. It was in a fairly long (9-10minutes or so) documentary style movie that was quite old, and I think had some mentions of ‘scientists’.
Have you seen it? Is there video? No. Is there photo evidence? No. Is Sports Illustrated a reliable source? Apparently, only when it is convenient. Do you know it was 9.82m? No. Does anybody? No. Quit being a dumbass.