Fogelson, not all scientific information is limited to peer reviewed research articles.
My analogy had to do with the concept of someone’s work being dismissed because they did not share the popular opinion.
If you are bent against me using a theoretical/philosophical concept in the context of a scientific discussion then disregard it. It’s not important.
The point is that there’s plenty of opposing view points out there stemming from highly respected scientists. This commonality is shared amongst all fields of science and otherwise.
Looking at some notes I have from Val he states that hyperplasia was originally found in humans via bodybuilding methods and goes on to explain the Paradox-to produce hyperplasia, need hypoxia but they’re oxidative, no hydrogen ions one Can create local hypoxia by pinching capillaries stopping blood flow to muscle and then creating hypoxia and that this leads to hyperplasia of myofibrils
This is 100% consistent with what is stated in the text I own from Zhelyazkov, Tsvetan, and Daniela Dasheva. Training and Adaptation in Sport. Sofia, Bulgaria: National Sports Academy, 2001.
What is it that you do for a living?