bringing this up again, i have a couple questions actually. I’m a former teammate of 1234asdf so I am still under the coach he is talking about, and believe it or not the program got even stranger (we lift before running, do tons of ladder drills, don’t taper for end of year meets but work harder, little to no accel work unless its after 400 repeats or something of that nature) but i have managed to at least convince my coach to kind of let me do my own thing since im the only sprinter who trains out of season.
here are the reasons he claims when i’ve talked to him:
-if you can do the form while tired, doing it fresh in a race will be easy
-its the effort of running fast that matters, not how fast your actually moving
-working to the point of feeling like your going to vomit is the only way to improve
-reapeat runs that are pretty much vomit sessions, but stuff like flys and tons of blast outs are the easy, low-int stuff meant to be done the days before and after meets
granted, he has groomed a few pretty good 300 runners (35.xx) but he has yet to produce a good 55 runner (i hold the camera SR with 6.92). it’s been tough to convince him the cf way is right bc i actually havent run a good time this year after trying to use cf principles, and though im fairly certain i overtrained, he just thinks im being lazy by sitting out the team repeat 400s and thats why i havent improved, not because i worked too hard in the fall
but enough for the background (just so you have an idea of what i’m dealing with). i’m considering dropping baseball this year to do spring track for the possibility of running track in college so i thought advice from a hs coach who uses cf stuff would be nice:
questions by reason from ur points:
-my coach thinks that by not doing his program i’m preventing myself from shining. any advice how to confront this?
-is SE worth really concentrating on before pure speed devel. for hs athletes, because I feel I have more potential still to improve my accel and peak speed, so is it worth switching my concentration to maintaing what i have longer as opposed to improving the raw stuff for the 100? (i’ve only run 55’s before so i’ve really only concentrated on my start, with some top speed work)
-i like the “play fast, train fast concept”, no questions on this one!
-my coach belives that it IS always true in reverse, and not necesarrily in the other way (ie. the idea that its the effort which improves the sprinting speed, not actually high intensity) any advice on how to convince him of the contrary?
-what are some tell-tale signs of overload i could point out to my coach when he doesnt believe me that ive probably worked too much? i’ve had past injuries resurface and feel fatigued sometimes, but he just thinks i’m whining. is there any more obvious ways to prove to him?
-about how long do you think athletes need to recover from other seasons? i only have a couple weeks in between winter and spring, and for some reason distance kids get a break and can skip this “hell week” which is all jogging and calisthenics, but the sprinters are suppose to be fine? is this right, or should i push for a longer break in between seasons (since i’m peaking for indoor, hopefully, haha)?
-both my head coach and sprint coach (who was a state champ 300m runner, so its not fun having to disagree with him when he has that behind him) were football players/coaches, and football does involve non “medium” speed running, so they see no reason to train track runners from football players (though i’m not a fan of my school’s football program either). does ur statement apply for football too?
sorry to bolster you with these, but I’m curious and want to reach my potential and learn! gotta be a 11.05 FAT 100 guy by fall if I want to run track for the next four years!!