That’s why don’t run track!!! And when you do run 10.16 at 21 the CEO of sport mocks your times and makes comparisons with running 9.6 and being a millionaire.
This is the problem with track…no media exposure, no money from races, tv contracts, shoes companies and so on…so, a top 10 ranked national athlete, makes like…a top 1000 nrl palyer ( so …no NRL,but academies, lower level and so on…)
Unless things have changed somewhat he is not the CEO.
http://www.atfca.com.au/docs/australia_cup_-_coaching_clinic_7_feb.pdf
He ran a windy (+2.6) 10.15 in 2007. His wind legal PB is 10.24 from the same year.
Anyone knows how bad his achilles injury is? He’s had more or less severe injuries pretty much every year since coming to Australia.
Was the below program the one you’re referring to? If so, it was not the program he was doing in the lead up to KL at all, it was the program he was doing in the lead up to Sydney 2000. When he ran 10.03, he was only 19 years old and had begun studying a Phys Ed course at uni, so he wasn’t full time. The volume of his training was far less than it was post KL. His diet also wasn’t much good. He used to enjoy eating McDonalds quite often, although it definitely didn’t show on his body! Before KL he went with some other aussie athletes including Paul “Hendo” Henderson to Houston to train with Tom Tellez. I think they were only there for a couple of weeks. Dan Pfaff didn’t have any influence on Khmel’s training before KL. After KL, Khmel included a lot more weights in Shirvo’s program as he found out that Pfaff’s sprinters spent a lot more time working on their strength in the gym and a lot less time on the track. I don’t think this decision was a wise one. Matt put on a lot more muscle, especially in his upper body, but it did not translate into a faster acceleration. The less emphasis on speed endurance meant that he never got near his best 200m times from 1998 again. I think if they had just stuck to what they were doing he would have gone sub 10 in 1999. His workload was just insane for a drug free athlete which meant that he was constantly fatigued and getting frequent illnesses.
MONDAY :
Morning session - Maximum strength
Dynamic warm up (includes jgging, drills, general stretching and specific stretching exercises for this particular session.)
Power cleans - 90kg x 5 reps, 100kg x 3 reps 110kg x 2 reps 120kg x 1-2 reps
Bench press - same progression up to 130kg (286lbs)
Squats - up to 200kg (440lbs)
Various exercises for abs and back
Sprint drills and plyometrics at the track
Warm down including jogging, stretching and massage.
Afternoon session - Stretching and Swimming
TUESDAY :
Morning session - maximum velocity and starting acceleration -
dynamic warm up
technical runs: 6 x 60m
acceleration runs: 6 x 60m
starts - up to 10 starts over 30m
handicap starts (putting training partners in front 1m- 3m)
“flying sprints” or assistance sprints (down hill or using wind) 4-6 x 50m
warm down
Afternoon session : massage
WEDNESDAY :
Morning session - power strength
warm up
explosive weights ( performed as fast as possible with only 50% of max or
lighter for 3 x 10 reps)
power clean or snatch
bench press
speed squat
jumps from half squat
“Borzov” jumps
sprint drills and sprints at the track
warm down
Afternoon session - technical and tactical (video and biomechanical
analysis)
THURSDAY
Morning session - speed endurance and bend technique (for 200m)
Dynamic warm up
technical drills and runs on the bend
sprint into bend and off the bend 4-6 x 60m
speed endurance - 2 sets (8 x 80m) at 95% intensity
technical tempo 75% intensity (2 x 250m)
warm down (jog and stretch)
Afternoon session - regular physio treatment
FRIDAY :
Tactical preparation for Competition and rest
SATURDAY :
Competition
SUNDAY :
Video analysis
[QUOTE=Neospeed;229108] His workload was just insane for a drug free athlete which meant that he was constantly fatigued and getting frequent illnesses.
- This is not such a tough workload. He should try training for a a triathlon, Tour de France…
Twic a day training is carried out by plenty of sportsmen who also hold down a full time job.
[quote="“oldbloke,post:266,topic:41089”]
Depends on the individual. Loading up on Impact training can be far more destructive than relatively supported training such as swimming, bicycling or any other primarily aerobic activity.
And Neospeed did refer to athletes training “drug free”. Let’s just leave it at that please.
The program you’re referring is a little misleading and is not the basis of my comments. I inherited the hard drive which Kheml had his 400m and 100m programs on. I also knew Kheml when he was a high school coach at Waverly College 1992 & I can give a chronology of his CV from 1992 to 2002 of all his 100m runners.
So I think I am more than qualified to assert that Matt was training full time and wasn’t eating burgers when he ran 10.03.
If you did know Khemls coaching methodology - then you would know that he would mix sessions on the day to day feel of athletes, e.g if Matt felt flat before comp he would change the session or at least some components of it.
[quote="“kitkat1,post:59,topic:13420”]
Kitkat, do you think elite sprinters can/should go up to twice a day sessions ? Such as tempo on a high intensity day.
In the context of this thread, that is the point at which a full time job does become a struggle.
This could be a PhD topic: training full time is a matter of opportunity and necessity (perceived) but with all the best intentions fulltime training is not the best option for everyone. Some need the distraction of work or study - the intellectual stimulation. Work/study can also provide a pressure valve; can provide a safeguard against overtraining-induced injury, illness and/or staleness. But sensible programming can be enormously productive for the right fulltime athlete, at least in the short to medium term. However many fulltime athletes are kidding themselves into believing it is the only pathway to success.
[quote="“oldbloke,post:64,topic:13420”]
Some ppl worry that working 38hrs per wk is a lot and nothing can be done thats any good towards training.
I call that, and raise it to bullocks.
Working a 38hr wk esp when its an Office type of job is basically physically resting.
I have worked 38hrs in a physically demanding job and still run well.
Try working 7 days a week, 12hr days (84hrs wk) in a physical job and 45-60min travel each way. I still found 20min each day to train in a gym AND improve. A Wife helps (food).
a 38hr wk, working on a computer can easily become a Rest distraction for a hard working 2x per day athlete. Not only that, they will be able to afford Physio, massage and other therapys. Also, the $$ to attend CF.com seminars and dvds etc that are invaluable. So long as they dont waste the $$ on cars etc they will be fine.
[quote="“boldwarrior,post:5,topic:43080”]
and you were a world class athlete while living this lifestyle? Wow. Which event?
You would also know that a program must be submitted so many months ahead or no funding, this is what was left behind, do you really think if it was worth much he would leave it behind.
I used to see him while training Shirvo and crew at Narrabeen, they had a set routine of drills at the start of each session. I used to see him once ar twice a fortnight and it suited him to meet whike he was training. I later got Michael Khmel to coach at a clinic in Newcastle for me, it was open to anyone, I did not apply for or receive funding and I paid all the bills.
What I noticed the most was they different way he coached at the clinic.
Michael got the job ay NSWIS because he had just finished a traineeship with Smith, Keith Connor was in charge. If he did go to Tellez then that explaines the huge difference between what I was expecting and what was taught, almost a speed dynamics course with a Russian accent. I suggest he knew he was leaving well before he did.
I kon’t know who Alozies is but I sure as hell knew who Matt Shirvington and Darren Clark were. Something to do with the media is missing.
I’m not sure where you’re going with this, but as it pertains (last sentence) to the media “something is missing” I would say simply that the Athletics Federation in Australia has no idea whatsoever of how the media works with the sport.
There seems to be a notion that it is the media’s job to cover their sport. Wrong!
Coverage of athletics, at least as I understand it (outside of Britain), has always depended absolutely and completely on whether some individual reporter happens to be interested in the sport. If they are, their editor will humour them by allowing the occasional piece, so long as his (the sports editors are almost always men) reporter continues to file footy and horse racing stories, and something on a “proper” summer sport such as baseball or cricket. Anything that draws a good crowd.
Most editors think providing coverage of Olympics sports is a waste of space, a total pain in the rear-end because it means they have even less space to devote to the big-money, crowd-drawing men’s team sports.
In fact, most editors wouldn’t go so far as to even “think” about Olympic sports until a bona fide Olympic star hits their town, or when the Games are almost upon them and they don’t dare ignore them even though that would, for most, be their primary instinct.
Of course, they will always find space for anything Usain Bolt does and they still love a Ben Johnson yarn.
But after Marion Jones, none of them would know the name of a single female sprinter in the world today. But I suppose they’re not the Lone Ranger in that respect.
Oh and, by the way, you say you know who Darren Clark is? Well, give him his due and spell his name correctly. Without the final “e”.
Thq question has already been answered
I was a 2-3 metre worst thrower working full time then being a student. I was not an elite athlete by any means but I trained 3-4 hours a day plus did as much recovery work as I could. The first 6 months of full time work and part time study on top of training my distances dropped by 7 metres, I became a bit smarter with programming for me and improved.
Oh sitting at a desk is not physically tiring, but mentally I was spent most weeks. Which I have found to be harder then physically tired.
The problem is…in an ideal world, a 10"70 athlete deserves to be a pro more than 99% of professional soccer players…but have to face reality
Job committments are sometimes hard to be matched with training…do not know in australia…but if you work in the north of italy…you have to be lucky not finding a desk job from 8 to 18…plus…indoor tracks?what are they…track open at lunch,…or in the morning?please…reformulate the question…:)…so could be possible…but the sport system is not always on par.
I disagree. Quick high school students run 10.70. In 2009, there were 47 of them in the USA who ran 10.70 or faster. That is not a professional level, in my opinion.
Off course there are many, but always less than prosoccer players in italy…Here we have 10s of thousand of shabby pseudoathletes who get paid to kick balls around 3-4 times a week…to me its a shame.
In the…6th italian division you get more than a national caliber athlete.
Well in the US, its the race promotors that get sponsers and winnings gathered. It seems you guys need better sponsors.