Clemson,or anyone else,
WHAT IS “the feel of the water” ? Is there such a thing on the track?
Yes,I presume,but nobody calls it “feel of the track”,right?
And Mikeh, You talk of “neurological adaptation”,sounds like a more targeted approach,maybe,but actually still esoteric…
Yet IT IS a very complex argument,but I really feel we have to start getting down to earth on this,well before any conventional,or uncomventional training approach is to be taken in our Sport…
Let’s start backwords, from what we’ve all experienced,and gradually build it into knowledges we all can apply…such a discussion would save time and provide concrete chances of success,by avoiding each other’s already done mistakes…
Swimming is a very open panorama,with many limits yet to be broken!
To start with:ever noticed how Your training on land (gym) influences this “feel of the water”?
If You ask Hungarian Coaches how to develop it ,They will mostly answer DRYLAND with BANDS,and “Swim Benches”,and they will tell You things in the water just follow accordingly…so?
I can well list more than one other land based experience which influences this esoteric “feel” powerfully,one way or the other…
So in water work as talked above might be just an option, not a necessity,for this peculiar issue.
But, to stay in the water,and throwing more meat on this table,I am attaching the following abstract…which apparently could well boost the Zura fins cause…
[i]Reer, R., Ramcke, C., Rudolph, K., & Braumann, K. M. (2002). Differences in swim economy and metabolic-cardiocirculatory parameters between endurance and sprint swimmers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34(5), Supplement abstract 1339
Male sprint (N = 18) and endurance (N = 18) swimmers performed a standardized swim in a swimming flume.
Endurance swimmers showed lower VO2 values at low intensities and higher values at high intensities than sprinters. Sprinters used less oxygen for performance at higher velocities. Individual anaerobic thresholds were lower for endurance swimmers than sprinters.
Implication. Swimming economy was best in both groups when they performed at their characteristic swimming velocities. Endurance swimmers are most economical when swimming at velocities that are slower than when sprinters are most economical.[/i]