Marion Jones Sues Former Coach

Sprinter’s lawsuit causing concerns

By Elliott Almond

Mercury News

Sprint star Marion Jones has sued her former coach in a contract dispute with ripple effects that threaten to limit the number of trainers and facilities available to aspiring Olympians.

Jones, who won the 100 meters at the U.S. championships Friday, asked a Texas court in March to overturn an arbitrator’s order that she pay $91,600 to Florida assistant track coach Dan Pfaff.

Details of that arbitration decision were revealed in Jones’ civil action, which has track coaches considering how to protect themselves against suit-happy athletes.

``As the ability to make money in the world of track and field grows, this type of activity will grow with it,’’ said Sam Seemes, executive director of the U.S. Track and Field and Cross Country Coaches Association.

Although track has become more professional in the past decade, there is no official structure for coaching elite American athletes.

A few coaches, such as Trevor Graham in Raleigh, N.C., and John Smith in Los Angeles, have created professional clubs separate from nearby universities. But most Olympic hopefuls depend on the generosity of college coaches, who allow their former athletes to train for free – and often without formal contracts.

As more learn the details of the Jones dispute – which stemmed in part from her contention that Pfaff’s coaching was ineffective – other athletes could be emboldened to sue if they are unhappy with their results. Seemes said that could destroy the current system of coaching, leaving athletes who lack major sponsors without a place to train.

Our coaches are at risk,'' Pfaff said. Our Olympic movement is at risk.’’

One of Jones’ attorneys, Donald J. Harris of Raleigh, disputed that.

I'm not sure how this situation could cause anybody concern,'' he said. If a coach has a contract with his athletes, they are bound by that contract.’’

Jones could not be reached for comment.

Seemes’ group, which represents 85 percent of college track coaches, wants to create a standardized contract, like those between voice coaches and actors.

Seemes is pushing for his group’s involvement because if Jones wins her suit, ``it means our coaches are open to huge liability problems,’’ he said.

Erica Wheeler, a 1996 Olympic javelin thrower from Stanford, said she understands the concerns.

``This kind of lawsuit will make anyone afraid to help an athlete out,’’ said the member of the USA Track & Field athletes advisory committee.

The lawsuit also could lead university administrators to bar elite athletes from their facilities for fear of being sued. Penn State’s Tim Curley, president of a national athletic directors group, said schools probably would address the situation case by case instead of calling for a nationwide ban of post-collegiate athletes.

Although it is not unusual for athletes to switch coaches because of disagreements or better opportunities, rarely does the situation evolve as it did with Jones, winner of five medals at the Sydney Olympics.

In August 2003, Pfaff left the University of Texas to train Jones and her then-companion Tim Montgomery. He signed five-year contracts with each sprinter worth $500,000 apiece. The first two years were guaranteed.

According to the suit, disagreements between the sprinter and coach began at the end of 2003. During arbitration, Jones said Pfaff ``adversely affected’’ her performance and livelihood by failing to provide the sprinter with a training program. At the time, Jones was in the middle of the Balco Laboratories drug scandal.

Pfaff, who has coached 30 Olympians, countered that Jones and Montgomery frustrated his efforts by refusing to submit to blood work and other health tests.

By that spring Montgomery – who was later banned as part of the Balco case – was training Jones in the sprints, in which she failed to qualify for the Athens Olympics. She followed Pfaff’s coaching only for the long jump, in which she did qualify by winning the U.S. trials. Because Jones made the team, coaches picked her to run the sprint relay.

In Greece, Jones finished fifth in the long jump and was involved in a mishandled relay exchange that disqualified the favored Americans.

Jones fired Pfaff a month later, court records show. When Pfaff threatened to sue to collect his salary for the second year of his contract, Jones took the coach to arbitration, as stipulated in their agreement. Although Montgomery also didn’t pay the coach, Pfaff has yet to take legal action against him.

Last December, an arbitrator ordered Jones to pay $91,600 of Pfaff’s salary for the second year and to cover legal fees for a total of $238,000.

In March, Jones sued in Dallas County District Court on a technicality. The case is pending.

Harris, Jones’ attorney, said he couldn’t advise Jones’ company, MLJ Associates, to ``pay under an order that is fundamentally flawed. It should be sent back.’’

Pfaff’s attorney, Edmund Skip'' Davis, said: Their technicality is just as frivolous as their original claim that Dan’s coaching was inadequate. She ought to just come around and do the right thing – pay the coach.

``As far as I’m concerned, Marion’s word is no good.’’

Jones, 30, now trains with Steve Riddick of Norfolk, Va., After an 11-month layoff, the sprinter has re-emerged as a headliner after facing drug questions since 2004.

I could fool myself into believing that none of the exterior things, the outside factors, had an effect, but that's not the case,'' she told reporters this month. I’m not Superwoman.’’

Pfaff said the case has devastated him emotionally and financially.

I've spent my life donating millions of hours to help kids make Olympic teams,'' he said. Then I get hit by something like this. To be honest I’m pretty gun shy’’ to coach elite athletes.

Pfaff said he would take comfort if his situation affects change.

``I don’t want to see any of my coaching colleagues go through anything remotely close to this,’’ he said.

If the contract states that the first two years be paid for…what is the lawsuit about? Jones is bound by her own signature and should pay the 200.000+ to Pfaff. This is rediculous. A contract is a contract. If you chose to “f” up your opportunity by bringing “personal” outside factors into the coaching realm, it’s your own damn fault.

Coaches really don’t get paid what they are worth to begin with. This is similar to teachers. The most important professions usually get paid the least. If I were to ever coach someone from this point on I want 20% of every dollar earned and a clause stating that the outcome of training be it positive or negative does not influence the monetary agreement in whole.

You can quote me on that:)

The contract is two sided and required the coach to provide an effective program. She has claimed she didn’t get it. You have accepted the bizarre line spread all over the net that she deliberately sabatauged herself to get Pfaff.
I’m not going to get into all of it beyond saying:
She fulfilled her promises to me to the letter without the need of any contract.
She is a dedicated worker who showed up on time and ready to work every time.
She never once balked at a workout.
She is infinitely talented and was successful everywhere else she went; successful in high school, successful with Trevor, was running well with me while she was here (Derek has a tape of her breaking the indoor WR over 60m in training while in Toronto.), and she’s successful now.

BTW, Pfaff must be the longest serving coach ever. By his own claim he: “Spent millions of hours helping kids make it to the Olympics” For those not mathematically inclined, that’s working 8 hours a day for a minimum of 685 years without a day off.

Charlie is right. I remember we made sure to pass on all videos of their runs (while training with Charlie) and all written workouts to them when they parted company with Charlie. So they had a record of everything that took place while training in Toronto (and Hawaii).

Strange thing was that a reliable source told us that Pfaff had claimed that Marion had no information on prior workout regimes, so that he had to start from scratch. It’s hard to believe - as Charlie said - that Marion would agree to pay this guy, and then not provide him with the information he needed to formulate a plan, when it was clearly readily available.

So, it would be interesting to know how the contract was honoured on BOTH sides.

I’m not at all attempting to comment on MJ vs. Pfaff. This thread, however, brings up an interesting point(at least to me!). How many track coaches out there have ever been expected to do extensive work with other sports teams and individuals for free just because “your the track coach” or “that’s what coaches do”? I’m not talking about spending a few minutes helping another team’s coach with a few drills, briefly discussing program basics, or helping an athlete(not one of yours) with a technical recommendation.

There are parents and coaches from other sports who think you have nothing better to do than to help some group for hours upon hours. When you can see that the work they need will take some time and you give them a $ amount,(even if very reasonable by most people’s standards) they seem to take offense. Obviously there is not much appreciation or respect for what it takes to do a good job of speed development, etc. by some anyway. Sorry for the only partially related rant.

This source openly discussed this at the Vancouver 2004 seminar. Those who attended will remember this. It certainly got our attention as we’d spent alot of time preparing the materials and, certainly, we were aware of their previous training.
Ask yourself why Marion (or anyone) would pay someone 200,000 a year to work with them and then refuse to give them vital information about previous training and refuse to cooperate. And, if this WAS true, why didn’t he contact me for it if he really wanted it.
Beyond that, you are left to decide for yourselves whether Pfaff intended to use her previous information about the training she had done for years and adjust where necessary or if he simply ignored it and carried out the training he used on others before her regardless of her background.
That’s all I have to say on this.

Off topic…How did she break-0?
FAT with gun start?

I am confused. I thought the first two years of the contract were gauranteed no matter the results they acheived, then the remaining 3 years would have a stipulation based on results. Seems like the story didn’t go into too much detail and I must be mistaken on the legalities.

You guys must have the insider story on the situation and I know what you mean by not wanting to bring up the subject. Lets move on…lol.

This is in practice from counting frames on the video, which is + or - .02. No matter how it is taken, she was under the record. That was why I was hoping she’d enter an indoor even somewhere, but she was already over 3 mos pregnant by then!!

:eek: wow she is a superb talent.

if that kid goes towards the positive genetic diviation. then :eek:

you mean 0.02 each frame?right?

That’s right. You can get 25frames form PAL and i think 29 from NTSC, which in total gives you 50 fields (because pictures are made up of 2 fields) so you can then get a resolution of 1/50s = 0.02s. Timing in this manner is very accurate (perhaps more so than some timing gates which can be broken by a hand etc before the body passes though them).

How fast do you think Marion could have gone in the 100m? Do you have the video of her running the 60m in practice?

So, how do you time precisely?use special cameras slo mo?with a simple camera how can I do?I use camera just for tech analysis

From a standard video camera you can get to 0.02 accuracy if you are using something like Dartfish. If you have a faster camera then you can have higher accuracy.

Suffice it to say she was/is the biggest talent of all time.

She won in 22.31

Wow. What a tremendous statement by someone who has truly seen it all. It is not unreasonable to believe/estimate that a woman with her proportions and race model would be capable of going under 10.6. If a 6.9 or so is possible, its conceivable that she would be able to run an average split of .92 over the last 40m yielding something in the neighborhood of 10.58.

Here is an interesting comment by someone who was, at the time coaching one of her biggest rivals:

June 20, 1998

At the U.S. national championships in New Orleans, she becomes the first woman in 50 years to win three individual events – the 100, 200 and long jump – and she matches her 10.71 in the 100. “What she’s getting ready to do is going to blow everybody’s mind,” says sprint coach John Smith, a 1972 U.S. Olympian in the 400 meters. “We’re talking about 10.50 or better for the 100, 21-flat for the 200 and, in the long jump, at least 25 feet.”

It amazes me that others are unwilling to acknowledge this and were so quick to either write her off or attribute her performances to anything other than talent and hard work.