Here I ask Kelly Baggett some help. Now I ask you guys your opinions too, especially you, Charlie da masta!
Hey Mr. Baggett,
I have one dilemma, and I need your help: Should I question my coaches’ training methods, or should I just listen to my coaches and not argue about their methodologies?
Here is what basically happened today. Today we practiced our 4 x 100 relay handoffs about 4 times. After that, he and she made us sprint 100 and jog 100 continuously w/o rest, 4 times to basically develop our “stamina and endurance for the 100.” He argues that even top sprinters couldn’t keep up their max speed in a race, therefore we, high school sprinters, should develop some endurance. Also he argues that this running/training will speed up the clearance of lactic acid build-up (which I believe is true, but isn’t that a waste of time because sprinters, especially the 100m guys, DON’T NEED such an adaptation. .it’s not basketball, and the adaptational reserves would be better saved for
. And so he recommends building strength (I agree) and building that lung capacity (I disagree). Sounds nonsense, so I asked him if he has any references… He basically just mentions that he’s been coaching for many years and has been to seminars and has read a lot about the subject…
He basically wants us to be able to do 5 x 200m w/ less than 1 min rest. runs without having a messed up form in the last runs.
So…what should I do? Should I show him an excerpt from the VJ Bible “More on Specific Endurance?” I love your examples. If yes, do you have any references I could use to support my argument in developing speed before speed endurance? If not, should I just listen to my coach and prevent arguments/ troubles from happening?? Sorry, this is so long… but I really need some help on this.
Thanks,
Edderic