http://www.asianathletics.org/index.htm
full list of results are here, great to see that Chinese Taipei have improved “NOT” since the last coach was told to leave. :eek:
HEY BUT WHO’S HOLDING A GRUDGE.
These chinese guys are better off without your mumbo jumbo. Go back to coaching fat kids who run 14 second 100m. Show them the benefits of short to long. Hopefully they run sub14.
Has not coached anyone, but yes he likes to talk. :eek:
Mushing Out:
I know a coach that loves to use the term “mushing out”
text removed
Nanny 69
Since you may know who Mushing Out is, maybe you can pass it on to KK & d-tasty, since they are deluded enough to think it is me.
I have an idea, who he is, but he seems to know you, and I don’t believe we have ever shared posts before.
Sharmer,
Take a moment to review your posts, they are starting to take a dubious appearance.
Thanks
Rupert
Point taken:
However Rupert you would know that my ISP address would be different then MO. I think this on going feud has defused itself out now. Those accusations have ended and sense has prevailed, Alls well if it ends well.
Well i’m glad to see they broke the 10.00 barrier now for the whites!!! haha but seriously.
Francis Samual of Qatar ran 9.99, if he’s Middle Eastern that makes him Asian, which is geneticly different then being white.
He was born in Nigeria to Nigerian parents!
Note I used the word IF, regardless he still isn’t white, and thats the point I was making.
Haters contribute Nothing . . . other than hatred.
Nanny put up his own money to bring Charlie to his (Nanny’s) country for the benefit of all who would listen. Nanny’s contribution to coaching, therefore, has been huge. There are talkers and doers. Nanny has demonstrated he’s a doer and a contributer.
Out of curiosity, is Mushing Out a coach?
I know who Nanny is but I’m not familiar with the coaching and or athlete achievements of he who calls himself “Mushing Out.”
Reply: Is MO a coach
Initially I thought he was a coach. However, after I did my investigations the coach who I thought MO was gets along well with Nanny & KK. My former coach would use the term MO when your leg collapsed on ground contact. MO is also a former athlete of this coach too. At the moment MO is the US training with Tellez. This athlete was supposed to demonstrate sprint starts, when Charlie came out here. However he bailed out at the last moment. Hence the bad feelings between him and Nanny. This clearly and distinctly establishes how I could not be MO. I never directed MO to make any comments against anyone, his identity was revealed to me from a few sources and the above co-incidences.
Your right about hatred, it will only inspire further acts of hate.
Sharmer has also shown his interest in helping members here through his most recent posts, which I appreciate.
so MO is formerly uphillinarmyboots? had no idea he felt that way, especially after he was treated to a free session with charlie during his visit here.
but i guess i was pre warned by many
Well, it’s your call Sharmer but I would say that after a rocky start things have sorted themselves out amicably enough and I can’t see any reason for you to withdraw now. You obviously have a lot to offer this forum and a willingness to contribute and to debate in a non-confrontational way. Stay please.
And don’t bother about those points, the boss (CF) has posted more than 6000 times and he’s stuck on 10 
Having perused many of Sharmer’s posts from years gone by, (over the last week or so) in the main, he does demonstrate a great level of knowledge across a range of issues relating to sprint training. As Charlie & KK suggest, he has a lot to offer.
My concern were some of the demeaning comments towards an eminent contributor in KK forcing KK to angrily respond. Reading KK’s recent posts, it is now obvious those issues has been cleared up. But these came after Sharmer had previously indicated he would not get personal, but he did anyway.
I must admit I was not happy being referred to as a dodgy pro coach by someone (Sharmer) I didn’t know on another thread. I thought best not to respond.
After a little investigation, it then occurred to me that Sharmer is one ‘Vic Sharma’, who has run many times on the Australian pro circuit. Being a student of the game, I also know that Sharma has not featured much in the pro results despite progressing out to the front marks (11.50m in a 120m) in the last year or two.
So while he is armed with a mountain of information, Sharmer has not achieved much on the practical side for someone who was supposedly running 10.8 at 18 and is now 30yo.
I don’t propose Sharmer should cease posting altogether. Rather Sharmer should spend less time posting and devote more time filling the pages of his career book with achievements; the pages turn a lot quicker as one gets older…
I just got home from the Casino when I made that post. It was a marathon stink from a $200 start. I was up $4500 on blackjack, and then I lost $4000 at poker. I have the skill but not the discipline to beat the dealer, plus I don’t have their bank either.
My cortisol levels must be sky high right now. This couldn’t be good for my training. I guess I was venting more frustration then anything with that post. I would be glad to stay on. 
Young I have ran better from tighter marks in early years: 2002 Bay sheff heats
1 Crichton Simon 8.50 12.570
2 Sharma Vic 7.75 12.635
3 McKenzie Shane 5.75 12.669
4 Tuohy Chris 6.75 12.702
5 Hicks Dylan 9.50 12.932
6 Sammut Daniel 9.75 13.011
7 Pasquali Walter 8.25 13.331
2006
EVENT WOODSTOCK BOURBON CENTRAL COAST SPRINT– 70 m TOTAL PRIZEMONEY $1,000.00
Placing Name Town/Suburb Handicap Time (e) Prizemoney
1st Vic SHARMA Winston Hills 8.00 m $500.00
2nd Robbie BASKIN Lindfield 5.75 m $200.00
3rd Jade FILIPCEVIC Hamilton North 13.50 m $100.00
4th Nathan WARD Ourimbah 7.25 m $80.00
5th Rod BUCHANAN Rhodes 4.00 m $30.00
6th Peter WALSH Victoria 6.50 m $30.00
7th Matt HARGREAVES Victoria 6.75 m $30.00
8th Melissa MEDLICOTT Killara 13.25 m $30.00
Winning Time: 7.34 secs (e)
But your right I have grossly underachieved, buts not related to academia but more because of on going Achilles problems.